TRAUMA
Educational Objectives
The goal of this program is to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity and mortality among trauma patients, especially
those in the geriatric age group. After hearing and assimilating this program, the clinician will be better able to:
 | 1. Discuss the impact of chronic medical conditions and medications on resuscitation of elderly trauma patients.
|
 | 2. Use appropriate imaging techniques to assess elderly patients with cervical spine injuries.
|
 | 3. Identify patients who may benefit from reversal of anticoagulation therapy after head trauma.
|
 | 4. Diagnose and treat elderly patients with isolated and multiple rib fractures.
|
 | 5. Implement guidelines for clearing the cervical spine of the comatose trauma patient.
|
Faculty Disclosure
In adherence to ACCME Standards for Commercial Support, Audio-Digest requires all faculty and members of the planning committee
to disclose relevant financial relationships within the past 12 months that might create any personal conflicts of interest.
Any identified conflicts were resolved to ensure that this educational activity promotes quality in health care and not a proprietary
business or commercial interest. For this program, the faculty and planning committee reported nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgments
Dr. McGee was recorded at PaACEP Day of Trauma, sponsored by the Pennsylvania Chapter of the American College
of Emergency Physicians, and held December 7, 2007, in Philadelphia, PA; Dr. Quickel was recorded at Emergency
Medicine and Trauma Update, sponsored by the Minnesota Chapter of the American College of Emergency
Physicians and HealthPartners Institute for Medical Education, and held November 8, 2007, in Bloomington, MN.
The Audio-Digest Foundation thanks the speakers and the sponsors for their cooperation in the production of this program.
Geriatric Trauma
Douglas McGee, DO, Chief Academic Officer and Director, Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Albert Einstein
Medical Center, New York, NY
| Background: population aging; older adults consume disproportionate percentage of health care dollars; older
trauma patients have much higher rates of mortality than younger patients with similar injuries; reasons for increased
mortality include physiologic effects of aging, presence of comorbidities, and patterns of injury; most studies
define geriatric patients as \>65 yr of age, but some have lower cutoff
|
| Falls: most common reason for injury in older adults; falls from standing or sitting may cause substantial injury; reasons
for falling include impaired vision, cognition, and mobility; studies show that assistive devices (eg, canes, walkers) do
not reduce rate of falling and may contribute to falls; medical conditions (eg, cardiac dysrhythmias, hypovolemia)
contribute to ≈25% of falls; morbidity and mortality≈10% mortality during acute injury phase; 50% mortality at 1
yr; common reason for institutionalization
|
| Motor vehicle accidents (MVAs): second most common cause of death among elderly; mortality rate ≈20% (7 times
that of younger patients); slow reaction time contributes to many accidents; MVAs often occur in daytime, in good
weather, and near patients home; most common scenario involves turning left in front of oncoming traffic; MVAs
less likely to involve alcohol, speeding, or reckless driving, compared to younger drivers; patterns of injury generally
similar, but older adults suffer more sternal fractures; medical conditions may precipitate MVA (single-vehicle
accident increases index of suspicion); vehicle-pedestrian accidentsassociated with severe injury and high rate
of mortality (elderly patient 21 times more likely to die than younger patient); contributing factors include impaired
vision, hearing, mobility, and judgment
|
| Impact of aging on injuries and recovery: cardiovascular (CV)aging myocardium and conducting system; brittle
vascular system (eg, large vessels often calcified and prone to disruption); preexisting heart disease reduces
ability to tolerate initial insult and resuscitation; medications (eg, β-blockers, antihypertensive agents, diuretics)
complicate resuscitation; pulmonarydecreased residual volume and vital capacity; osteoporosis increases risk
for rib fracture; fragility and decreased compliance render chest wall intolerant to mechanical insult; other complicating
factors include congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; skeletalosteoporosis
increases risk for fracture; decreased mobility and range of motion increase risk for accidents; spinal stenosis increases
risk for spinal cord injury; central nervous system (CNS)increased risk for cord syndromes; increased
risk for epidural hematoma (dura tightly adhered to skull); presence of brain atrophy increases risk for subdural hematoma,
even with relatively small translational force
|
| Medications: increase risk for accidents and complicate resuscitation; examplessleeping aids, phenothiazines, antidepressants,
and other agents have CNS effects; antihypertensive agents and β-blockers have CV effects; diuretics
may result in dehydration (patients often volume-depleted at presentation); anticoagulant therapy complicates
head injuries; prevalence (study data)50% of elderly trauma patients take diuretics; 60% take medications with
CV effects; 38% take medications with psychotropic effects; 20% take anticoagulants
|
| Trauma triage protocols: increased morbidity and mortality associated with advanced age lowers threshold for decision
to send to trauma center; factors that increase morbidity and mortality include preexisting medical conditions,
significant base-deficit, low revised trauma score, and low respiratory rate; insufficient triage common
among patients ≥55 yr of age; establishment of triage protocols specific for elderly patients recommended
|
| Resuscitation: elderly patients less able to recover from O2 debt and more likely to have late presentation of and low
tolerance for shock; compensatory tachycardia may not occur, due to devices (eg, pacemaker) or medications (eg,
β-blockers); overresuscitating patient with ventricular dysfunction often fatal; hyper- and hypoperfusion poorly
tolerated; goalstreat for shock; diagnose and admit patient as quickly as possible; reducing time to admission to
advanced care setting significantly improves survival
|
 | Airway: indications for intubation similar to those for younger patients, but elderly patients may require earlier intervention;
factors that affect decision to intubate include severity of O2 debt and presence of thoracic trauma; intubation
complicated bylimited neck mobility, small airway opening, and friable airway tissues; increased
risk for hemorrhage; denturesleave in while ventilating with bag-valve mask; remove before intubating; induction
agentsall have some CV effects; consider reducing dose
|
 | Breathing: compromised compliance and brittle thoracic cage increase risk for rib fractures and subsequent complications;
recommendationsconsider early intubation for patients with multiple rib fractures; be vigilant about
clearing pulmonary secretions
|
 | Circulation: risk for hypo- and hyperperfusion; elderly patients have poor CV reserve and cannot accommodate extra
fluid; dehydration (often present at baseline) and many medications complicate calculations;
recommendationssearch for occult hemorrhage; identify other issues affecting circulation; focus on cellular
perfusion and oxygenation (eg, check lactate level and base deficit) rather than vital signs
|
 | Disability: most patients have some disability at baseline; although many elderly patients have impaired cognition at
baseline, treat altered mental status as new-onset until proven otherwise; nontraumarelated factors that contribute
to altered mental status include hypoglycemia and medications
|
 | Exposure: hypothermiacommon; decreased mobility, social and economic issues, and decreased basal metabolic
rate contribute; to reduce coagulation problems associated with hypothermia, keep patients warm; pressure
ulcerscan form quickly; remove patient from back board as quickly as possible
|
| Cervical spine: increased risk for fracture, especially of upper cervical segments; degenerative changes complicate
interpretation of plain radiographs; guidelines for radiography (study data)among alert asymptomatic patients
>65 yr of age, presence of distracting injury above clavicle increases risk for cervical spine fracture; risk not affected
by mechanism of injury; distracting injuries below clavicle had no impact; concluded that lack of distracting
injury above clavicle in asymptomatic patient means x-rays not necessary; National Emergency X-Radiography
Utilization Study (NEXUS) decision rulevalid for patients \>65 yr of age (can safely avoid getting x-rays when
patient characterized as low-risk for fracture); odontoid fractures common; upper cervical spine fractures particularly
common among patients \>75 yr of age, even after minor trauma (eg, fall from sitting in chair); some protocols
(eg, Canadian Cervical Spine Rule) require radiographs for all patients ≥65 yr of age; other imagingbecause of
degenerative changes in spine and risk for fracture and cord syndromes, include computed tomography (CT) of
neck if performing head CT
|
| Head trauma: severity of injury and presence of preexisting medical conditions affect prognosis; elderly patients at increased
risk for death due to multiorgan failure; effect of anticoagulation therapyaccording to most studies, associated
with increased mortality, especially when international normalized ratio (INR) elevated; warfarin, aspirin,
clopidogrel, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increase risk for intracranial complications and mortality;
deterioration may occur quickly, even in absence of obvious neurologic abnormalities; 6-hr observation period
or imaging recommended for elderly patients with head trauma; contrary datafindings from one study (Gittleman
et al, 2005) suggested patients with normal neurologic examination and normal Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score do
not require CT, even if taking anticoagulants; another study found warfarin therapy associated with poor outcomes after
non-head trauma but not after head trauma (most other studies show association); because age independently increases
risk for death after head trauma, some clinicians recommend CT for all elderly patients with even minor head
injury; reversing anticoagulationhigh INR warrants reversal; reversal agents for patients on warfarin therapy include
vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma, prothrombin complex concentrate, and recombinant factor VII; reversal agents
for patients on aspirin or clopidogrel include platelets, desmopressin, and possibly recombinant factor VII
|
| Thoracic trauma: impaired mechanics, poor compliance, and underlying lung disease contribute to poor outcomes;
multiple rib fracturesamong patients ≥65 yr of age, morbidity and mortality increases with increasing number
of rib fractures; admission recommended for patients with \>3 rib fractures (admit patients with \>6 rib fractures to
intensive care unit [ICU]); flail chest (study data)associated morbidity and mortality increases by 132% with
each decade (beginning at second decade); for those >55 yr of age, likelihood of death increases by 32% for each
point increase in injury severity score; isolated rib fracturesstudy found 36% of patients had pulmonary complications
(fatal in ≈10%); hypoxia and presence of comorbidities increase risk; outcomes difficult to predict; pulmonary
contusionsmortality twice that of younger patients; conclusions aggressive search for rib fractures
warranted in elderly, even in absence of pneumothorax or pulmonary contusion (consider radiography series or
CT); patients with multiple fractures should be admitted
|
| Pelvic fractures: associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality; insufficiency fracturesrelated to underlying
bone disease; include compression fractures; may occur with minimal trauma; associated with long lengths of stay and
high rates of debilitation (50% have poor functional recovery; 25% require institutionalization; 1-yr mortality, ≈15%)
|
Cervical Spine Clearance
Robert Quickel, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Clinical Track, University of Minnesota Medical School, and
Director of Surgical Critical Care, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN
| Conscious patients: cervical spine injuries occur in 2% to 4% of patients with blunt trauma; asymptomatic
patientsclinical examination sufficient for patients without changes in mental status, pain, or distracting injury;
symptomatic patientsradiography recommended
|
| Comatose patients: cervical spine injuries occur in 5% to 8% of patients with traumatic brain injury; patients unable
to report symptoms, and examinations unreliable; history of limb movement (all 4 extremities) indicates intact spinal
cord; missed cervical spine injuriesoccurs in 0.3% of comatose patients; associated with medicolegal consequences
for clinician and physical and financial consequences for patient; importance of clearing cervical spine
complications associated with prolonged use of cervical collar include occipital pressure ulcers, difficult airway
management, catheter-related problems, delirium (associated with prolonged immobilization of conscious patients),
and increased risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia
|
| Guidelines for clearing cervical spine in comatose patients: Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma
most recent revisions in 2000 (update in progress); plain radiographs (anteroposterior, lateral, and open-mouth
odontoid views); axial CT of upper cervical spine (3-mm intervals from occiput to second cervical vertebra [C2]);
flexion-extension radiography (static images at extremes) for patients with normal findings on radiography and CT
(requires presence of surgeon); note, plain radiographs may be abandoned in updated version of guidelines; American
College of Radiologyguidelines updated in 2005; multislice or multidetector CT with sagittal and coronal
reconstructions; plain radiograph of upper cervical vertebrae (looking for fracture in C2, especially among older
patients; axial CT misses odontoid fractures); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) recommended for patients comatose
\>48 hr
|
| Imaging techniques: flexion-extension radiographyfallen out of favor, due to risk for harm in comatose patients;
acceptable option for conscious patients (patient moves head and neck and reports pain); for comatose patients,
technique often dangerous, inaccurate, inadequate, resource-intensive, and incomplete (neck extension difficult in
comatose patient, so some clinicians avoid); CTcervical CT often performed at same time as head CT; studies
generally adequate and accurate; disadvantages include cost, radiation exposure, poor visualization of ligamentous
injury, and scanner variability; important to perform sagittal and coronal reconstructions of axial scans; MRI
good technique for identifying injuries to ligaments and soft tissues, but not fractures; no radiation exposure; disadvantages
include frequency of false-positive findings, transport and monitoring issues (eg, if scanner located remotely),
and cost
|
| Studies: several studies show high prevalence of ligamentous injury requiring immobilization but not surgery; unstable
ligamentous injury rare, and may be identified with CT or MRI; retrospective review found evidence of ligamentous
injury on cervical CT images originally considered negative; study concluded that multislice CT has
98.9% negative predictive value for ligamentous cervical injury and 100% negative predictive value for unstable
cervical spine injury; other studies support use of helical CT for clearing cervical spine (all clinically relevant injuries
identified); clearing cervical spine early with CT (vs waiting until patient regains consciousness) reduces immobilization-related
complications, time on ventilator, and ICU and hospital stays, and does not increase mortality;
no predictive factors identify patients likely to benefit from MRI
|
| Closing comments: technique, operator experience, and CT scanner characteristics important when clearing cervical
spine of comatose patient; additional studies include lateral plain films of C2 or MRI (especially if patient has not
moved extremities); speaker recommends keeping data from CT for additional reconstruction (eg, at 1-mm intervals),
if necessary
|
Suggested Reading
Anekstein Y et al: The use of dynamic CT surview for cervical spine clearance in comatose trauma patients: a pilot prospective
study. Injury 39:339, 2008; Bauza G et al: High mortality in elderly drivers is associated with distinct injury patterns: analysis
of 187,869 injured drivers. J Trauma 64:304, 2008; Gittleman AM et al: Indications for CT in patients receiving anticoagulation
after head trauma. Am J Neuroradiol 26:603, 2005; Grandhi R et al: Anticoagulation and the elderly head trauma patient.
Am Surg 74:802, 2008; Harris TJ et al: Clearing the cervical spine in obtunded patients. Spine 33:1547, 2008; Ivascu FA et
al: Predictors of mortality in trauma patients with intracranial hemorrhage on preinjury aspirin or clopidogrel. J Trauma 65:785,
2008; Menaker J et al: Computed tomography alone for cervical spine clearance in the unreliable patientare we there yet? J
Trauma 64:898, 2008; Ong AW et al: Detection of cervical spine injuries in alert, asymptomatic geriatric blunt trauma patients:
who benefits from radiologic imaging? Am Surg 72:773, 2006; Pieracci FM et al: Degree of anticoagulation, but not warfarin
use itself, predicts adverse outcomes after traumatic brain injury in elderly trauma patients. J Trauma 63:525, 2007; Schrag SP
et al: Cervical spine fractures in geriatric blunt trauma patients with low-energy mechanism: are clinical predictors adequate? Am
J Surg 195:170, 2008; Sharma OP et al: Perils of rib fractures. Am Surg 74:310, 2008; Tomycz ND et al: MRI is unnecessary
to clear the cervical spine in obtunded/comatose trauma patients: the four-year experience of a level I trauma center. J
Trauma 64:1258, 2008.
|