Audio-Digest Foundation: family-practice

Main Written Summaries Listing | Family-practice: 2009 Listings
Audio-Digest FoundationFamily Practice


Volume 57, Issue 13
April 7, 2009

The following is an abstracted summary, not a verbatim transcript, of the lectures/discussions on this audio program. If, after reviewing this written summary, you would like to hear the contents and/or earn CME/CE credit:

View Main Program Listing

Visit Audio-Digest Home Page

Family Practice Program InfoAccreditation InfoCultural & Linguistic Competency Resources





BAD INFECTIONS, GOOD MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

From Family Medicine Update 2008, sponsored by the University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis




Educational Objectives

The goal of this program is to improve management of hepatitis and urinary tract infections. After hearing and assimilating this program, the clinician will be better able to:
Describe the differences between hepatitis A, B, and C, including treatment and disease course.
Identify candidates for vaccination against hepatitis A.
Explain how hepatitis C is transmitted.
Diagnose a urinary tract infection (UTI).
Manage an elderly patient with UTI.


Faculty Disclosure

In adherence to ACCME Standards for Commercial Support, Audio-Digest requires all faculty and members of the planning committee to disclose relevant financial relationships within the past 12 months that might create any personal conflicts of interest. Any identified conflicts were resolved to ensure that this educational activity promotes quality in health care and not a proprietary business or commercial interest. For this program, the following has been disclosed: Dr. Smith reported that he receives research support from and is a consultant for Gilead, Roche, and Schering-Plough. Dr. Kravitz and the planning committee reported nothing to disclose.


Acknowledgements


This program was recorded at Family Medicine Update 2008, held May 12-16, 2008, in Minneapolis, MN, and sponsored by the University of Minnesota Medical School. The Audio-Digest Foundation thanks the speakers and University of Minnesota Medical School for their cooperation in the production of this program.



Hepatitis A, B, and C
Coleman I. Smith, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis

Hepatitis A virus (HAV): RNA virus
Epidemiology: low prevalence in United States, Australia, and Western Europe; spread through fecal-oral transmission; usually through household or sexual contact, or daycare centers; also spread by food handlers (especially those handling raw shellfish), and those who have traveled to endemic areas; bloodborne spread possible, but rare; sexual transmission more likely in men who have sex with men
Typical course: virus usually absent from stool by time symptoms and elevated transaminases appear; IgM anti- HAV antibody subsequently appears; virus spread during incubation phase (2-3 wk), often before patient aware of infection; antibody disappears within 6 mo, but immunity lifelong; young children and young adults usually have mild disease; older children and older adults have clinical disease; 90% of infected children <6 yr of age have subclinical disease, then remain immune for life
Vaccination: 2 products available (both excellent, with high seroconversion rates and few side effects); 2 injections, 6 mo apart; candidates—anyone traveling to areas with intermediate to high prevalence rates of HIV or HAV; men who have sex with men; users of injection drugs; anyone with chronic liver disease (likelihood of contracting HAV not higher, but severity of disease greater); residents of communities with high rates of hepatitis infection (eg, American Indians); children at 2 yr of age; persistence of immunity—>20 yr; antibody levels occasionally too low for detection by standard commercial assays, but vaccination “successful in the vast majority of cases”; combination hepatitis A and B vaccine (Twinrix) recommended for anyone susceptible to both viruses
Hepatitis B virus (HBV): DNA virus; has surface antigen; complex internal structure with characteristic E antigen, which acts as serologic marker; geographic distribution—low prevalence in United States, Australia, and Western Europe; high prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and parts of South America; also high among Alaskan Natives; 33.5 million US residents foreign-born, many from areas with high prevalence of HBV; represent major source of HBV cases in United States
Transmission routes: blood-borne, sexual, maternal-child (likely via blood during birth); nearly 50% of cases involve risk factor (eg, injection drug use, multiple sexual partners, men having sex with men, sex with infected partner, blood transfusion [rare], hemodialysis or needlestick [rare]); no specific cause identified in slightly >50% of cases (however, most patients immigrants from endemic areas)
Clinical features: incubation period 60 to 90 days; clinical illness usually occurs in individuals >5 yr of age; mortality low, but higher than that associated with HAV; 30% to 90% of patients in newborn to 5-yr-old age group have chronic HBV (body will not clear virus; responsible for most clinical cases); of those who become infected with HBV at older age (ie, older children or adults), only 2% [adults] to 10% develop chronic liver disease; however, high mortality associated with chronic infection
Serology: acute—HBV surface antigen (HbsAg) appears, then disappears; no virus detected during incubation period; E antigen marker of whole virus in blood and ongoing replication; usually clears eventually; HBV anti-core antibody appears at same time as HbsAg, but remains in blood; marker of exposure (no association with immunity); anti-core antibody appears first as IgM antibody, which disappears in 32 wk; subsequently switches to IgG; presence of IgG anti-core antibody indicates patient previously exposed to HBV; IgM indicates exposure more recent (patient may still have virus or is currently recovering); eventually, patient develops HBV surface antibody (HbsAb), which is marker of immunity
Transmission: patient infected by time symptoms appear; patient likely to have already transmitted virus
Chronic infection: patient does not make HbsAb; HBsAg persists; viral replication may continue for years; E antigen also persists; only IgG anti-core antibody seen; patient not immune
Clinical progression: liver disease may be minimal, requiring little treatment and attention; patients should be followed for possible hepatocellular carcinoma (may occur before chronic liver disease develops); patient may develop cirrhosis and require transplantation; some patients may have intervals of good health interspersed with flare-ups that exacerbate liver damage; Risk Evaluation of Viral Load Elevation and Associated Liver Disease/ Cancer-In HBV (REVEAL-HBV) study showed association between viral load, mortality, and risk for cancer
Treatment: recommended for patients with high levels of HBV DNA and liver damage; goal to lower viral DNA as much as possible, improve liver histology (in clinical trials), normalize liver enzyme levels, and eliminate E antigen and HbsAg (if possible); recent mutations block formation of E antigen; in those cases, HBV DNA only measure of replication; E antigen-negative patients respond less well to treatment and may require lifelong therapy (some E antigen-positive patients can discontinue treatment 6-12 mo after seroconversion); take- home message—viral replication may be occurring even if patient does not have E antigen; E antigen-negative patients outnumber antigen-positive patients in many regions, including southern Europe (Mediterranean region); patients with cirrhosis—treat for life, regardless of E antigen status
Drugs: interferons (rarely used); lamivudine (no longer used as monotherapy, due to high risk [70% at 2-3 yr] of developing resistant viral strains); speaker recommends entecavir (Baraclude) and tenofovir (PMPA; Viread); speaker does not recommend telbivudine
Vaccine: safe and effective (prevents cancer)
Hepatitis C virus (HCV): RNA virus; replicates in liver cells; 12 trillion virions produced daily, resulting in many “quasi-species” of virus; several genotypes also identified (hinders vaccine development)
Natural history: after exposure, 15% of patients clear virus; remaining patients develop chronic disease; in some patients, liver damage progresses to cirrhosis over 20 to 30 yr; among this subgroup, some also develop liver cancer (usually occurs only with cirrhosis; requires transplantation); risk factors for rapid progression—infection at older age; male sex; coinfection with HIV or HBV; fatty liver disease; white ethnicity; more than 2 to 3 alcoholic drinks/day; obesity; use of cannabis or heroin (may hasten fibrosis); level of alanine aminotransferase, viral load, viral genotype, or mode of transmission do not affect progression of disease
Clinical manifestations: patients often asymptomatic; symptoms often nonspecific (malaise, fatigue, weakness); more advanced disease associated with jaundice; virus spreads through blood; risk factors—injection drug use (perhaps intranasal drug use as well); transfusion of clotting factors (before use of recombinant technology); long-term hemodialysis (rarer today than formerly); organ transplantation or transfusion of blood products before 1992, when testing for HCV introduced; sexual transmission—rare; risk higher with multiple partners; maternal-fetal transmission—risk <5%
Advice to patients: do not donate blood; donate organs only to other HCV-positive people; recommend testing for sexual partners (however, barrier precautions not recommended, due to low risk for sexual transmission)
Patient evaluation: antibody good screen for exposure; does not confer immunity; measure HCV RNA and liver function; however, liver damage may occur even with normal liver function tests (biopsy to assess degree of inflammation and fibrosis)
Treatment: goals—clear virus; prevent disease progression; regimen—pegylated interferon weekly or ribavirin daily, for 24 to 48 wk; both treatments associated with serious side effects; ribavirin teratogenic (neither patient nor partner should become pregnant until 6 mo after treatment); success defined as sustained viral response (ie, virus not detectable at end of treatment, or 6 mo thereafter); improvement in histology also often seen


Urinary Tract Infections: To Treat or Not to Treat?
Gary R. Kravitz, MD, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis

Sample case: 80-yr-old man admitted with acute aphasia and left-sided weakness; patient afebrile, but experiencing chills and distress; urinalysis shows 10 to 25 white blood cells (WBCs) per high-power field (HPF); urine culture shows >105 colony-forming units (CFU) of Escherichia coli per milliliter
Diagnosis: standard criterion of >105 CFU/mL incorrect; chosen from studies in young girls as number unlikely to be due to skin or urethral contamination; does not always denote infection; similarly, <105 CFU/mL does not count out infection; diagnosis made on presence of symptoms as well as bacteriuria
Pyuria: 5-10 WBCs/HPF upper limit of normal; >10 WBCs/HPF indicates abnormal pyuria in healthy person, but often persists chronically in elderly people with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), so >10 WBCs/HPF not, by itself, indicative of infection in absence of symptoms
Cystitis: most common symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI); usually self-limited (resolves in 10 days); recurs due to infection with new bacteria, making prolonged courses of antibiotic to eradicate pathogen unnecessary; in young women, preferred treatment is antibiotics for 3 days; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ; eg, Bactrim) rarely used today because many E coli strains now resistant; however, resistance to quinolones also increasing; oral third-generation cephalosporin (cefpodoxime) “can come in handy”
Pyelonephritis: β-lactams kill organism more slowly than TMP/SMZ, aminoglycosides, or quinolones; speaker prescribes third-generation cephalosporin or piperacillin plus tazobactam; may take 2 to 5 days to see improvement; can then switch patient to oral antibiotics and treat as outpatient; imaging studies recommended only if patient unduly septic or unresponsive to treatment; if using β-lactam, treat patient for 2 wk
Nosocomial UTI: almost always due to urinary catheters; only 8% are symptomatic; microbiology becoming more complex (Pseudomonas, extended-spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL]-producing E coli, Klebsiella; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; vancomycin-resistant enterococci; yeast)
Asymptomatic bacteriuria: defined as >105 CFU/mL in 2 urine specimens (women) or single specimen (men); >100 CFU/mL in specimen from catheterized patient; prevalence increases with age (20% among people >70 yr); may be 40% to 50% among people in long-term care facilities (LTCFs); virtually 100% among people with long-term indwelling catheters; most common reason for antibiotic prescriptions in LTCFs; ASB estimated to outnumber symptomatic cases by 100 to 1; in febrile patients with Foley catheter, bacteriuria causes fever only 12% of time; difficult to ask demented or aphasic patient about symptoms; Foley catheter major risk factor for serious symptomatic infection; pyuria—common in people with ASB; may persist for years; cannot distinguish ASB from true UTI, but absence means infection unlikely
Treatment: several studies show that treating elderly patients with ASB has no impact on incidence of symptomatic UTI, urinary incontinence, or survival; however, treated patients did have higher incidence of adverse drug reactions and recolonization with resistant organisms; findings similar in patients with Foley catheters; conclusion— do not screen for or treat ASB
Clostridium difficile infection (CDI): common in LTCFs; infection rates climbing; new strains more severe; “don’t trade ASB for CDI”; antibiotics most likely to produce resistance include imipenem-cilastatin and clindamycin; moxifloxacin, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone also “up there;” safest drugs include cephalexin, TMP-SMZ, amoxicillin, metronidazole, and doxycycline (lowest risk for resistance)
Candidates for ASB treatment: pregnant patients; patients about to undergo urologic surgery; patients with duplication of urinary system (rare), polycystic kidneys, or recurring infections; diabetes, prosthetic joints or heart valves, and immunosuppression or transplantation no longer indications for treatment; in noncatheterized patients, treatment most appropriate for those with acute symptoms (urinalysis indicated only in presence of symptoms); catheterized patients—very high risk for UTI; symptoms may be nonspecific; look for fever, new delirium, rigors, and new tenderness of costovertebral angle; delirium characterized by rambling, hallucinations, and change of consciousness or cognition; do not automatically ascribe to UTI (may result from adverse drug reaction, metabolic disturbances, or fluctuating course of Alzheimer’s disease)
Conclusion: treat only symptomatic UTI
Asymptomatic candiduria (ASC): risk factors for colonization similar to those for ASB; diabetes, urinary catheters, previous antibiotic use prominent; one-third to two-thirds of cases resolve spontaneously; candidemia rare (almost exclusive to neutropenic patients or those who have undergone urologic surgery); evidence suggests therapy does not alter clinical outcome; recurrence common; resistance may develop; no established value to treatment


Suggested Reading

Campos-Outcalt D: Vaccine update: new CDC recommendations from 2007. J Fam Pract 57:181, 2008; Chen CJet al: Long-term outcomes in hepatitis B: the REVEAL-HBV study. Clin Liver Dis 11:797, 2007; Chevaliez S, Pawlotsky JM: Diagnosis and management of chronic viral hepatitis: antigens, antibodies and viral genomes. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 22:1031, 2008; Colgan R et al: Asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults. Am Fam Physician 74:985, 2006; Koslap-Petraco MB et al: Hepatitis A: disease burden and current childhood vaccination strategies in the United States. J Pediatr Health Care 22:3, 2008; Nicolle LE: Asymptomatic bacteriuria: review and discussion of the IDSA guidelines. Int J Antimicrob Agents 28 Suppl 1:S42, 2006; Pan JJ, Firpi RJ: The management of hepatitis C. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 55:23, 2009; Peters MG: Diagnosis and management of hepatitis B virus and HIV coinfection. Top HIV Med 15:163, 2007; Stoller EP et al: Lay management of chronic disease: a qualitative study of living with hepatitis C infection. Am J Health Behav 33:376, 2009; Tambyah PA, Maki DG: The relationship between pyuria and infection in patients with indwelling urinary catheters: a prospective study of 761 patients. Arch Intern Med 160:673, 2000; Vogt TM et al: Declining hepatitis A mortality in the United States during the era of hepatitis A vaccination. J Infect Dis 197:1282, 2008.

Reproduction of this summary in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

If, after reviewing this written summary, you would like to hear the contents and/or earn CME/CE credit:

View Main Program Listing

Visit Audio-Digest Home Page