BAD INFECTIONS, GOOD MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
From Family Medicine Update 2008, sponsored by the University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis
Educational Objectives
| The goal of this program is to improve management of hepatitis and urinary tract infections. After hearing and assimilating
this program, the clinician will be better able to:
|
 | Describe the differences between hepatitis A, B, and C, including treatment and disease course.
|
 | Identify candidates for vaccination against hepatitis A.
|
 | Explain how hepatitis C is transmitted.
|
 | Diagnose a urinary tract infection (UTI).
|
 | Manage an elderly patient with UTI.
|
Faculty Disclosure
In adherence to ACCME Standards for Commercial Support, Audio-Digest requires all faculty and members of the
planning committee to disclose relevant financial relationships within the past 12 months that might create any personal
conflicts of interest. Any identified conflicts were resolved to ensure that this educational activity promotes
quality in health care and not a proprietary business or commercial interest. For this program, the following has been
disclosed: Dr. Smith reported that he receives research support from and is a consultant for Gilead, Roche, and Schering-Plough.
Dr. Kravitz and the planning committee reported nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgements
This program was recorded at Family Medicine Update 2008, held May 12-16, 2008, in Minneapolis, MN, and sponsored
by the University of Minnesota Medical School. The Audio-Digest Foundation thanks the speakers and University
of Minnesota Medical School for their cooperation in the production of this program.
Hepatitis A, B, and C
Coleman I. Smith, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis
| Hepatitis A virus (HAV): RNA virus
|
 | Epidemiology: low prevalence in United States, Australia, and Western Europe; spread through fecal-oral transmission;
usually through household or sexual contact, or daycare centers; also spread by food handlers (especially
those handling raw shellfish), and those who have traveled to endemic areas; bloodborne spread possible, but
rare; sexual transmission more likely in men who have sex with men
|
 | Typical course: virus usually absent from stool by time symptoms and elevated transaminases appear; IgM anti-
HAV antibody subsequently appears; virus spread during incubation phase (2-3 wk), often before patient aware
of infection; antibody disappears within 6 mo, but immunity lifelong; young children and young adults usually
have mild disease; older children and older adults have clinical disease; ≈90% of infected children <6 yr of age
have subclinical disease, then remain immune for life
|
 | Vaccination: 2 products available (both excellent, with high seroconversion rates and few side effects); 2 injections,
6 mo apart; candidatesanyone traveling to areas with intermediate to high prevalence rates of HIV or
HAV; men who have sex with men; users of injection drugs; anyone with chronic liver disease (likelihood of
contracting HAV not higher, but severity of disease greater); residents of communities with high rates of hepatitis
infection (eg, American Indians); children at 2 yr of age; persistence of immunity>20 yr; antibody levels
occasionally too low for detection by standard commercial assays, but vaccination successful in the vast majority
of cases; combination hepatitis A and B vaccine (Twinrix) recommended for anyone susceptible to both
viruses
|
| Hepatitis B virus (HBV): DNA virus; has surface antigen; complex internal structure with characteristic E antigen,
which acts as serologic marker; geographic distributionlow prevalence in United States, Australia, and Western
Europe; high prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and parts of South America; also high among Alaskan Natives;
33.5 million US residents foreign-born, many from areas with high prevalence of HBV; represent major
source of HBV cases in United States
|
 | Transmission routes: blood-borne, sexual, maternal-child (likely via blood during birth); nearly 50% of cases involve
risk factor (eg, injection drug use, multiple sexual partners, men having sex with men, sex with infected
partner, blood transfusion [rare], hemodialysis or needlestick [rare]); no specific cause identified in slightly
>50% of cases (however, most patients immigrants from endemic areas)
|
 | Clinical features: incubation period 60 to 90 days; clinical illness usually occurs in individuals >5 yr of age; mortality
low, but higher than that associated with HAV; 30% to 90% of patients in newborn to 5-yr-old age group have
chronic HBV (body will not clear virus; responsible for most clinical cases); of those who become infected with
HBV at older age (ie, older children or adults), only 2% [adults] to 10% develop chronic liver disease; however,
high mortality associated with chronic infection
|
 | Serology: acuteHBV surface antigen (HbsAg) appears, then disappears; no virus detected during incubation period;
E antigen marker of whole virus in blood and ongoing replication; usually clears eventually; HBV anti-core
antibody appears at same time as HbsAg, but remains in blood; marker of exposure (no association with immunity);
anti-core antibody appears first as IgM antibody, which disappears in ≤32 wk; subsequently switches to
IgG; presence of IgG anti-core antibody indicates patient previously exposed to HBV; IgM indicates exposure
more recent (patient may still have virus or is currently recovering); eventually, patient develops HBV surface antibody
(HbsAb), which is marker of immunity
|
 | Transmission: patient infected by time symptoms appear; patient likely to have already transmitted virus
|
 | Chronic infection: patient does not make HbsAb; HBsAg persists; viral replication may continue for years; E antigen
also persists; only IgG anti-core antibody seen; patient not immune
|
 | Clinical progression: liver disease may be minimal, requiring little treatment and attention; patients should be followed
for possible hepatocellular carcinoma (may occur before chronic liver disease develops); patient may develop
cirrhosis and require transplantation; some patients may have intervals of good health interspersed with
flare-ups that exacerbate liver damage; Risk Evaluation of Viral Load Elevation and Associated Liver Disease/
Cancer-In HBV (REVEAL-HBV) study showed association between viral load, mortality, and risk for cancer
|
 | Treatment: recommended for patients with high levels of HBV DNA and liver damage; goal to lower viral DNA as
much as possible, improve liver histology (in clinical trials), normalize liver enzyme levels, and eliminate E
antigen and HbsAg (if possible); recent mutations block formation of E antigen; in those cases, HBV DNA
only measure of replication; E antigen-negative patients respond less well to treatment and may require lifelong
therapy (some E antigen-positive patients can discontinue treatment 6-12 mo after seroconversion); take-
home messageviral replication may be occurring even if patient does not have E antigen; E antigen-negative
patients outnumber antigen-positive patients in many regions, including southern Europe (Mediterranean region);
patients with cirrhosistreat for life, regardless of E antigen status
|
 | Drugs: interferons (rarely used); lamivudine (no longer used as monotherapy, due to high risk [70% at 2-3 yr] of
developing resistant viral strains); speaker recommends entecavir (Baraclude) and tenofovir (PMPA; Viread);
speaker does not recommend telbivudine
|
 | Vaccine: safe and effective (prevents cancer)
|
| Hepatitis C virus (HCV): RNA virus; replicates in liver cells; 12 trillion virions produced daily, resulting in many
quasi-species of virus; several genotypes also identified (hinders vaccine development)
|
 | Natural history: after exposure, 15% of patients clear virus; remaining patients develop chronic disease; in some
patients, liver damage progresses to cirrhosis over 20 to 30 yr; among this subgroup, some also develop liver cancer
(usually occurs only with cirrhosis; requires transplantation); risk factors for rapid progressioninfection
at older age; male sex; coinfection with HIV or HBV; fatty liver disease; white ethnicity; more than 2 to 3 alcoholic
drinks/day; obesity; use of cannabis or heroin (may hasten fibrosis); level of alanine aminotransferase, viral
load, viral genotype, or mode of transmission do not affect progression of disease
|
 | Clinical manifestations: patients often asymptomatic; symptoms often nonspecific (malaise, fatigue, weakness);
more advanced disease associated with jaundice; virus spreads through blood; risk factorsinjection drug use
(perhaps intranasal drug use as well); transfusion of clotting factors (before use of recombinant technology);
long-term hemodialysis (rarer today than formerly); organ transplantation or transfusion of blood products before
1992, when testing for HCV introduced; sexual transmissionrare; risk higher with multiple partners; maternal-fetal
transmissionrisk <5%
|
 | Advice to patients: do not donate blood; donate organs only to other HCV-positive people; recommend testing for
sexual partners (however, barrier precautions not recommended, due to low risk for sexual transmission)
|
 | Patient evaluation: antibody good screen for exposure; does not confer immunity; measure HCV RNA and liver
function; however, liver damage may occur even with normal liver function tests (biopsy to assess degree of inflammation
and fibrosis)
|
 | Treatment: goalsclear virus; prevent disease progression; regimenpegylated interferon weekly or ribavirin
daily, for 24 to 48 wk; both treatments associated with serious side effects; ribavirin teratogenic (neither patient
nor partner should become pregnant until 6 mo after treatment); success defined as sustained viral response (ie,
virus not detectable at end of treatment, or 6 mo thereafter); improvement in histology also often seen
|
Urinary Tract Infections: To Treat or Not to Treat?
Gary R. Kravitz, MD, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis
| Sample case: 80-yr-old man admitted with acute aphasia and left-sided weakness; patient afebrile, but experiencing
chills and distress; urinalysis shows 10 to 25 white blood cells (WBCs) per high-power field (HPF); urine culture
shows >105 colony-forming units (CFU) of Escherichia coli per milliliter
|
| Diagnosis: standard criterion of >105 CFU/mL incorrect; chosen from studies in young girls as number unlikely to
be due to skin or urethral contamination; does not always denote infection; similarly, <105 CFU/mL does not
count out infection; diagnosis made on presence of symptoms as well as bacteriuria
|
 | Pyuria: 5-10 WBCs/HPF upper limit of normal; >10 WBCs/HPF indicates abnormal pyuria in healthy person, but
often persists chronically in elderly people with asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), so >10 WBCs/HPF not, by itself,
indicative of infection in absence of symptoms
|
 | Cystitis: most common symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI); usually self-limited (resolves in ≤10 days); recurs
due to infection with new bacteria, making prolonged courses of antibiotic to eradicate pathogen unnecessary;
in young women, preferred treatment is antibiotics for 3 days; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ;
eg, Bactrim) rarely used today because many E coli strains now resistant; however, resistance to quinolones also
increasing; oral third-generation cephalosporin (cefpodoxime) can come in handy
|
 | Pyelonephritis: β-lactams kill organism more slowly than TMP/SMZ, aminoglycosides, or quinolones; speaker prescribes
third-generation cephalosporin or piperacillin plus tazobactam; may take 2 to 5 days to see improvement;
can then switch patient to oral antibiotics and treat as outpatient; imaging studies recommended only if patient
unduly septic or unresponsive to treatment; if using β-lactam, treat patient for 2 wk
|
 | Nosocomial UTI: almost always due to urinary catheters; only 8% are symptomatic; microbiology becoming more
complex (Pseudomonas, extended-spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL]-producing E coli, Klebsiella; methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus; vancomycin-resistant enterococci; yeast)
|
| Asymptomatic bacteriuria: defined as >105 CFU/mL in 2 urine specimens (women) or single specimen (men);
>100 CFU/mL in specimen from catheterized patient; prevalence increases with age (≈20% among people >70
yr); may be 40% to 50% among people in long-term care facilities (LTCFs); virtually 100% among people with
long-term indwelling catheters; most common reason for antibiotic prescriptions in LTCFs; ASB estimated to
outnumber symptomatic cases by 100 to 1; in febrile patients with Foley catheter, bacteriuria causes fever only
12% of time; difficult to ask demented or aphasic patient about symptoms; Foley catheter major risk factor for serious
symptomatic infection; pyuriacommon in people with ASB; may persist for years; cannot distinguish
ASB from true UTI, but absence means infection unlikely
|
 | Treatment: several studies show that treating elderly patients with ASB has no impact on incidence of symptomatic
UTI, urinary incontinence, or survival; however, treated patients did have higher incidence of adverse drug reactions
and recolonization with resistant organisms; findings similar in patients with Foley catheters; conclusion
do not screen for or treat ASB
|
 | Clostridium difficile infection (CDI): common in LTCFs; infection rates climbing; new strains more severe; dont
trade ASB for CDI; antibiotics most likely to produce resistance include imipenem-cilastatin and clindamycin;
moxifloxacin, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone also up there; safest drugs include cephalexin, TMP-SMZ, amoxicillin,
metronidazole, and doxycycline (lowest risk for resistance)
|
 | Candidates for ASB treatment: pregnant patients; patients about to undergo urologic surgery; patients with duplication
of urinary system (rare), polycystic kidneys, or recurring infections; diabetes, prosthetic joints or heart
valves, and immunosuppression or transplantation no longer indications for treatment; in noncatheterized patients,
treatment most appropriate for those with acute symptoms (urinalysis indicated only in presence of symptoms);
catheterized patientsvery high risk for UTI; symptoms may be nonspecific; look for fever, new
delirium, rigors, and new tenderness of costovertebral angle; delirium characterized by rambling, hallucinations,
and change of consciousness or cognition; do not automatically ascribe to UTI (may result from adverse drug reaction,
metabolic disturbances, or fluctuating course of Alzheimers disease)
|
 | Conclusion: treat only symptomatic UTI
|
| Asymptomatic candiduria (ASC): risk factors for colonization similar to those for ASB; diabetes, urinary catheters,
previous antibiotic use prominent; one-third to two-thirds of cases resolve spontaneously; candidemia rare
(almost exclusive to neutropenic patients or those who have undergone urologic surgery); evidence suggests therapy
does not alter clinical outcome; recurrence common; resistance may develop; no established value to treatment
|
Suggested Reading
Campos-Outcalt D: Vaccine update: new CDC recommendations from 2007. J Fam Pract 57:181, 2008; Chen CJet
al: Long-term outcomes in hepatitis B: the REVEAL-HBV study. Clin Liver Dis 11:797, 2007; Chevaliez S,
Pawlotsky JM: Diagnosis and management of chronic viral hepatitis: antigens, antibodies and viral genomes. Best
Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 22:1031, 2008; Colgan R et al: Asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults. Am Fam Physician
74:985, 2006; Koslap-Petraco MB et al: Hepatitis A: disease burden and current childhood vaccination strategies in
the United States. J Pediatr Health Care 22:3, 2008; Nicolle LE: Asymptomatic bacteriuria: review and discussion of
the IDSA guidelines. Int J Antimicrob Agents 28 Suppl 1:S42, 2006; Pan JJ, Firpi RJ: The management of hepatitis
C. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 55:23, 2009; Peters MG: Diagnosis and management of hepatitis B virus and HIV
coinfection. Top HIV Med 15:163, 2007; Stoller EP et al: Lay management of chronic disease: a qualitative study of living
with hepatitis C infection. Am J Health Behav 33:376, 2009; Tambyah PA, Maki DG: The relationship between
pyuria and infection in patients with indwelling urinary catheters: a prospective study of 761 patients. Arch Intern Med
160:673, 2000; Vogt TM et al: Declining hepatitis A mortality in the United States during the era of hepatitis A vaccination.
J Infect Dis 197:1282, 2008.
|