HEART FAILURE: AN ANALYSIS OF MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
Educational Objectives
| The goal of this program is to improve outcomes among patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). After hearing
and assimilating this program, the clinician will be better able to:
|
 | Discuss therapeutic targets and identify factors that affect prognosis of CHF.
|
 | Explain the rationale for diuretic therapy and the clinical implication of diuretic resistance.
|
 | Initiate evidence-based medical therapy and discuss the role of device therapy for patients with CHF.
|
 | Detail the differential diagnosis for patients with hyponatremia.
|
 | Describe the role of volume overload in the cascade of events leading to onset and progression of CHF.
|
Faculty Disclosure
In adherence to ACCME Standards for Commercial Support, Audio-Digest requires all faculty and members of the planning
committee to disclose relevant financial relationships within the past 12 months that might create any personal conflicts
of interest. Any identified conflicts were resolved to ensure that this educational activity promotes quality in health
care and not a proprietary business or commercial interest. For this program, the following has been disclosed: Dr. Boyle receives
honoraria from CHF Solutions and St. Jude Medical and is an advisor for Medtronic, Ventracor, and Thoratec; Dr.
OBrien has received research grants from Encysive Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Cardiokine, Novartis, Pfizer, Otsuka, and
Astellas. The planning committee reported nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Boyle was recorded at Family Medicine Update 2008, presented by University of Minnesota Medical School, and
held May 12-16, 2008, in Minneapolis, MN; Dr. OBrien was recorded at Cardiology for the Primary Physician, presented
by Medical University of South Carolina, and held May 28-31, 2008 in Charleston, SC. The Audio-Digest
Foundation thanks the speakers and the sponsors for their cooperation in the production of this program.
Heart Failure
Andrew Boyle, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, and Medical Director, Division of Cardiology, Heart Failure, and
Transplantation, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis
| Scope of problem: ≈5 million people in United States have congestive heart failure (CHF); >500000 new cases annually;
5-yr mortality rate as high as 50%; largest expense for Medicare; relatively few experts in advanced CHF, so primary
care providers responsible for bulk of care; ≈1.5 million patients have moderate to advanced CHF (ie, shortness of breath
at rest or with minimal exertion on daily basis)
|
| Disease progression: left ventricular (LV) injurymost commonly caused by coronary artery disease; other causes include
diabetes, valvular disease (eg, as result of chronic hypertension), and other cardiomyopathies (often unidentified); cardiac
remodelingLV injury activates variety of neurohormonal pathways, leading to pathologic changes; ventricle dilates and ejection
fraction (EF) decreases; symptoms emerge; reverse remodelinggoal of therapy; shrinking ventricle improves prognosis;
deathsudden cardiac death or progressive pump dysfunction
|
| Targets of therapy: diureticsreduce fluid volume (ie, cardiac preload); vasodilatorseg, nitroglycerin, hydralazine,
angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors; agents reduce cardiac preload and afterload; inotropic agents
increase contractility; long-term outcomesimproving cardiac output has little effect; decongestion important; patients
discharged with high pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (PCWP) have poor outcomes, compared to those with
normal PCWP
|
 | Decongestion: often insufficient; registry data from 105000 patients admitted to hospital for decompensated CHF show
16% of patients gained weight (ie, increased fluid volume) during stay, and 33% lost <5 lb; failure to adequately decongest
patients increases risk for subsequent readmission; diuretic therapyreduces fluid retention and improves exercise
tolerance, but not shown to improve mortality from CHF; ACE inhibitors and β-blockers do improve mortality
|
| Hospitalization: LV dysfunction not cause for hospitalization; may not correspond with symptoms or functional impairment;
problems leading to hospitalization include noncompliance (with diet and/or medication) and diuretic resistance
|
| Diuretic response: nephron requires threshold concentration of loop diuretic before excreting sodium, after which excretion
dose-responsive; diuretic resistancehigher threshold concentration; larger doses required to achieve similar increases
in sodium excretion (ie, nephrons less responsive); management strategyillogical to continue increasing dose
of agent to which patient resistant; switching strategies more likely to result in benefit
|
| Nesiritide: recombinant B-type natriuretic peptide (rhBNP); endogenous BNP produced in left ventricle in response to
stretch (volume overload); hemodynamic effects primarily result from vasodilation and reflexive increase in cardiac index
because of afterload reduction; advantagesdoes not exacerbate neurohormonal cascade; does not increase heart rate
(HR) or risk for arrhythmias; decreases PCWP, systolic blood pressure (BP), and mean right atrial pressure; studyfluid
intake and output closely monitored; addition of nesiritide did not increase diuresis or sodium excretion; outpatient studies
also show no benefit for decongestion
|
| Vasopressin antagonists: stimulate diuresis without sodium excretion; studycompared to placebo, tolvaptan improved
decongestion but had no effect on outcomes; clinical and research implicationssodium excretion (not simply
fluid diuresis) important for improving outcomes; studies looking at diuretic agents (for management of CHF) should
measure sodium excretion, not simply loss of weight or fluid
|
| Ultrafiltration therapy: reserved for patients with diuretic resistance; associated with increased weight loss, compared
to intravenous (IV) diuretic therapy; improves outcomes (eg, 90-day readmission rate); removes sodium and water; approach
to decongestionultrafiltration good option for patients with true diuretic resistance; diuretic therapy often sufficient
if patient excretes isotonic urine; if urine hypotonic, diuresis inefficient (consider ultrafiltration)
|
| Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT): leadsright atrium; right ventricle (lead also has defibrillator coil);
left ventricle; effectcoordinates timing of contraction of ventricles; study showed improved functional capacity (based
on 6-min walk), increased EF (even small increases associated with improved prognosis), decreased LV end-diastolic dimension
(ie, reverse remodeling), and decreased mitral regurgitation (associated with symptom improvement);
indicationsmoderate to severe CHF (speaker recommends for patients with NYHA class III); widened QRS (indicator
of ventricular dyssynchrony); systolic dysfunction; symptoms present despite maximized medical therapy (including β-
blocker, ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB] and diuretic, titrated to maximum tolerated doses); medical
therapy after CRTimprovements in, eg, heart rhythm, HR, and BP, allow up-titration of medications to recommended
doses
|
| LV-assist devices (LVADs): used as bridge to transplantation and for patients who do not meet age criteria for transplantation;
pumpplaced beneath abdominal wall; drains blood from left ventricle and pumps it to ascending aorta;
patientsrequire anticoagulation therapy (typically managed by primary care provider); outcomesappropriate patient
selection improves likelihood of success; candidates have NYHA class IV CHF and poor quality of life (QOL);
successful implantation of LVAD results in durable improvement in functional capacity and QOL
|
 | New devices: use magnetic levitation technology, so rotor spins continuously without friction; preliminary results show
12-mo survival rates of ≥86%; advantagesanticipated to last 5 to 10 yr (compared to 15-18 mo for other LVADs);
smaller; improved patient satisfaction; can be used in smaller patients (eg, women)
|
| Stage-based approach to management: stage Apatients at risk for CHF but have no structural disease; treat risk
factors (eg, hypertension, dyslipidemia); encourage lifestyle modification (eg, exercise, reduction of alcohol consumption);
consider ACE inhibitors for appropriate patients (eg, diabetics); stage Bpatients have structural heart disease (eg,
hypertrophy, reduced EF) but asymptomatic; treat risk factors; initiate ACE inhibitor and β-blocker (lifelong therapy);
stage Cstructural heart disease; patient symptomatic (presently or previously); treat risk factors; initiate or continue
ACE inhibitor and β-blocker; consider aldosterone receptor antagonist for patients with normal kidney function and no
hyperkalemia (contraindicated in patients with creatinine >2 mg/dL or potassium >5 mEq/L); consider digitalis for patients
with frequent visits to hospital; adjust diuretic therapy for decongestion; consider CRT for appropriate patients;
stage Dpatients with refractory CHF; in addition to therapies already mentioned, consider device therapy and cardiac
transplantation; encourage palliative care (eg, continuous IV inotropic agents, hospice care) when appropriate
|
Hyponatremia in Heart Failure
Terrence X. OBrien, MD, Professor of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| Volume overload: primary target in management of decompensated CHF; edemasodium concentration affects volume
of extracellular fluid (ECF); elevation of total-body sodium and total-body water results in volume overload and
edematous states (eg, CHF, ascites, cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome); sodium level may appear low (because of excess
ECF), even when total sodium high
|
| Signs and symptoms of hyponatremia: often asymptomatic; symptoms tend to emerge when sodium <120 mEq/L
or drops quickly; generally nonspecific (eg, headache, lethargy); serious complications include seizure and coma
|
| Work-up: history and physical examinationrule out liver and kidney disease, thyroid and adrenal disorders, syndrome of
inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH; especially in patients with neurologic or pulmonary disease), and
psychogenic causes; obtain drug history (prescription and recreational drugs); determine pregnancy status; assess volume
status (orthostatics; HR; BP; skin turgor; mucous membranes); laboratory studiesserum osmolality; urine electrolytes
and osmolality; thyrotropin and cortisol levels in new patients and those with unclear history; imagingchest x-ray and
computed tomography of head for patients with neurologic impairment
|
| Osmolality: hypertonic>300 mOsm/kg; assess for presence of osmotically active molecules (eg, glucose, mannitol) in
serum; hypotonicgenerally related to volume status
|
| Volume status: hypervolemic hyponatremiavolume overload obvious; symptoms include pulmonary rales, jugular
venous distention, pedal and sacrotesticular edema, and weight gain; urine sodium generally <10 mEq/L in patients with
CHF, cirrhosis, or nephrosis (increases with advanced renal failure); hypo-volemic hyponatremialow fluid and (sometimes)
sodium levels may result from overdiuresis; extrarenal losses include gastrointestinal (GI) losses, third spacing, inadequate
intake, and insensible losses; euvolemic hyponatremiaincreased urine osmolality; causes include SIADH
(decreased urine sodium, urine output, and serum urea nitrogen; associated with neurologic events, malignancy and metastasis,
and some medications; often overlooked in older patients), adrenal insufficiency, hypothyroidism, psychogenic polydipsia,
and low solute intake
|
| General approach to treatment: goalprevent cerebral edema and encephalopathy without causing central pontine
myelinolysis (results from correcting sodium level too rapidly); general guidelineincrease sodium by 1.5 to 2 mEq/L/
hr if serious cerebral dysfunction present; otherwise, increase by 10 to 12 mEq/L during first 24 hr and 18 mEq/L during
first 2 days; standard therapiesfluid restriction (inexpensive; effective when monitored, but compliance difficult); demeclocycline
and lithium rarely used because of toxicity and adverse effects; loop diuretics (appropriate in some patients;
free water excretion must be greater than sodium and potassium excretion; balance must exist between diuretic action and
salt ingestion); urea no longer used; hypertonic saline for patients with cerebral edema (rate of correction difficult to
judge; patients require monitoring [eg, for myelinolysis] in intensive care unit)
|
| Vasopressin antagonists: vasopressinpowerful vasoconstrictor; target receptorsvasopressin 1a (V1a ) receptors
located on blood vessels; V2 receptors located on renal tubules; blocking V2 receptors results in water diuresis (ie, no
salt excretion); advantagesno activation of neurohormonal cascade; no excretion of solute; no worsening of renal
function; systemic levels of vasopressin remain within physiologic range
|
 | Conivaptan (Vaprisol): indicationssymptomatic hyponatremia (hypervolemic or euvolemic); useloading dose (20 mg)
followed by infusion (40 mg/day) for 2 to 4 days; resultsserum sodium levels increase to >130 mEq/L or by >12 mEq/
L over 24 hr; increased levels persist for 30 days; mechanism of actionblocks V1a and V2 receptors; results in diuresis
without loss of electrolytes; contraindicationshypovolemia; use of medications that inhibit CYP3A system (eg, antifungal
agents, some antiviral agents); interactionsother drugs metabolized by CYP3A system (eg, simvastatin, amlodipine);
agents should be discontinued before initiating conivaptan therapy; precautionsavoid correcting serum sodium
too quickly; important notenot indicated for management of CHF; adverse effectscommon reactions include phlebitis
and pain at infusion site, nausea, and GI complaints; in general, safety profile good
|
| Congestion: patients often admitted because of symptoms related to volume overload; volume overload also contributes
to neurohormonal activation and (eventually) decompensatory effects of CHF; presenting complaints (eg, decompensated
CHF, hypertension, pulmonary edema) often related to volume overload; pathophysiologyincreased tension on endocardium
decreases subendocardial and coronary perfusion, impairing systolic and diastolic function; increased myocardial
load leads to neurohormonal activation, systolic and diastolic failure, systemic effects of chronic CHF (including
decreased threshold for arrhythmias), altered levels of electrolytes, and cardiac remodeling; remodeling results in decreased
cardiac output, mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, and decreased renal perfusion
|
| Clinical course: initial decompensation corrected with appropriate medical therapy; progressive remodeling results in
subsequent hospitalizations for decompensation and in overall decline; factors affecting prognosisif congestion not
corrected during admission, mortality rate doubles; registry data show that hyponatremia increases length of stay, in-hospital
mortality, and 1-yr mortality; outcomes related to severity of hyponatremia
|
| Management of stage-C CHF: standard medical therapy includes diuretics, ACE inhibitors, and β-blockers; aldosterone
antagonists, digitalis, and/or hydralazine and nitrates recommended for some patients; implantable cardioverter
defibrillators or cardiac resynchronization for appropriate patients; exercise training
|
 | Diuretics: standard of care, but limited evidence of outcome benefit (level C evidence); adverse effects include volume
depletion, electrolyte disturbance, neurohormonal activation, myocardial fibrosis (with chronic use), decreased glomerular
filtration rate and worsening renal function, hyperglycemia (in diabetic patients), abnormal lipid profiles, and loss
of water-soluble vitamins; no evidence that loop diuretics improve mortality rates, but important for correction of acute
congestion
|
 | Aldosterone inhibitors: aldosterone contributes to neurohormonal activation and leads to electrolyte imbalances, increasing
risk for arrhythmias; high levels of aldosterone associated with increased deposition of collagen (leading to fibrosis);
large clinical trials show mortality benefit of aldosterone inhibitors; indicationspatients with stage-C CHF with
adequate renal function; combination with ACE inhibitor or ARB (but not both) acceptable; follow-upmonitor renal
function and potassium levels
|
| Tolvaptan: vasopressin antagonist with higher affinity for V2 receptors; clinical trialspilot study (tolvaptan added to
recommended medical therapy for patients with CHF) found no change in cardiac remodeling, but showed mortality benefit;
Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study with Tolvaptan (EVEREST) showed short-
term benefit in symptoms but no mortality benefit; safety profilegenerally well tolerated; adverse effects include dry
mouth, thirst, and hypernatremia; electrolyte profile more favorable than with placebo; futurepossible indication for
short-term management of acute symptoms
|
Suggested Reading
Annane D et al: Efficacy and safety of oral conivaptan, a vasopressin-receptor antagonist, evaluated in a randomized, controlled
trial in patients with euvolemic or hypervolemic hyponatremia. Am J Med Sci 337:28, 2009; Bartone C et al: Comparison
of ultrafiltration, nesiritide, and usual care in acute decompensated heart failure. Congest Heart Fail 14:298, 2008;
Gheorghiade M et al: Relationship between admission serum sodium concentration and clinical outcomes in patients
hospitalized for heart failure: an analysis from the OPTIMIZE-HF registry. Eur Heart J 28:980, 2007; Hernandez AF et
al: Clinical effectiveness of β-blockers in heart failure: findings from the OPTIMIZE-HF Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:184,
2009; John R, et al: Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist
device as bridge-to-transplant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 86:1227, 2008; Konstam MA et al: Effects of oral tolvaptan
in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure: the EVEREST Outcome Trial. JAMA 297:1319, 2007; Mehta RH et al:
Association of weight change with subsequent outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure. Am J
Cardiol 103:76, 2009; Miller LW et al: use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J
Med 357:885-2007; Somberg JC, Molnar J: The management of acute heart failure and diuretic therapy. Am J Ther Jan
8, 2009 [Epub ahead of print]; Udelson JE et al: Acute hemodynamic effects of tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor
blocker, in patients with symptomatic heart failure and systolic dysfunction: an international, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled
trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1540, 2008; Wertman BM et al: Ultrafiltration for the management of acute
decompensated heart failure. J Card Fail 14:754, 2008; Yancy CW et al: The Second Follow-up Serial Infusions of Nesiritide
(FUSION II) trial for advanced heart failure: study rationale and design. Am Heart J 153:478, 2007.
|