Audio-Digest Foundation: general-surgery

Main Written Summaries Listing | General-surgery: 2007 Listings
Audio-Digest FoundationGeneral Surgery


Volume 54, Issue 11
June 7, 2007

The following is an abstracted summary, not a verbatim transcript, of the lectures/discussions on this audio program. If, after reviewing this written summary, you would like to hear the contents and/or earn CME/CE credit:

View Main Program Listing

Visit Audio-Digest Home Page

General Surgery Program InfoAccreditation InfoCultural & Linguistic Competency Resources





MELANOMA AND INCIDENTALOMA

MODERN MELANOMA MANAGEMENT ----- David J. Cole, MD, McKay Rose Professor of Surgery and Head, Division of General Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
Epidemiology: 47,000new cases and almost 8000 melanoma-related deaths in United States in 2005; high cost and economic impact; incidence increasing 10% per year (faster than that of any other tumor); 5-yr case fatality rate decreasing (89% in 1925 vs 20% in 1995)
Risk factors: genetic—history of dysplastic nevus; dysplastic nevus syndrome; family history of melanoma; environmental—history of severe sunburn or multiple sunburns (especially at young age); decreasing latitude or increasing altitude of residence (intense exposure to sun); increased exposure to sun (work-related or recreational); race—lower incidence among blacks
Anatomic classification: superficial spreading—most common; typically has irregular border, pigmentation, and surface; usually arises from preexisting nevus; commonly seen on trunk and extremities; grows radially and vertically and has central areas of regression; nodular—represents 15% to 30% of cutaneous melanomas; exhibits most aggressive growth (vertical growth predominates); typically arises de novo; deeply pigmented; lentigo maligna— progresses most slowly (radial growth predominant); typically occurs on areas exposed to sun; acral-lentiginous— relatively rare; typically occurs on palms, soles, and subungual areas (work up subungual hematomas that occur without explanation)
ABCs of diagnosis: asymmetry; border irregularity; color variation; diameter \>6 mm; using these criteria, experienced observers can identify 90% of clinically significant melanomas; early diagnosis important; thin lesions associated with better prognosis; biopsy—excisional and incisional techniques; microstaging requires full-thickness biopsy into subcutaneous tissue; shave or curette biopsies contraindicated (prevent accurate measurement of thickness); full-thickness punch or excisional biopsy appropriate for lesions 2 cm; punch biopsies of larger lesions may not accurately reflect thickness
Microstaging systems: Clark—levels 1 through 5 reflect extent of dermal invasion (eg, epidermal, dermal, subdermal); Breslow—measures absolute thickness; more reliable than Clark; note—ideally, Clark and Breslow stages correlate (ie, thin lesions have low Clark’s level); thin lesions with high Clark’s level treated as intermediate thickness; prognostic factors—tumor thickness; level of invasion; ulceration; anatomic location (may have impact); age, sex, and race also should be considered
Local excision: former recommendation of 5-cm margins based on anecdotal evidence; World Health Organization (WHO) trial found 1-cm margins sufficient for lesions <1 mm thick (no recurrences over 5 yr); multi-institutional trial found no statistically significant differences in rates of local recurrence between 2-cm and 4-cm margins; current recommendations for excisional margins—0.5 to 1.0 cm for in situ (preinvasive) lesions; 1 cm for lesions <1 mm thick; 2 cm for lesions of intermediate thickness; some controversy about larger lesions (risk for distant metastasis may exceed risk for local recurrence); special sites—for lesions on head, neck, or ear, Mohs’ surgery best option to achieve adequate margins with minimal disfigurement; excision of lesions on breast based on standard factors of prognosis (ie, site does not affect prognosis)
Lymph node dissection: rationale—provides information for staging and treatment decisions; may aid in regional control and cure (no randomized controlled trials); sentinel lymph node biopsy provides important prognostic information; therapeutic dissection—15% to 20% of patients with clinically positive nodes who undergo dissection have 10-yr disease-free survival; lymphadenectomy therefore considered in otherwise healthy patients, but clinician should discuss risks with patient; 50% to 60% of patients with microscopically positive nodes have 10-yr disease-free survival (strong indication for therapeutic dissection); elective dissection—prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial found no survival benefit
Sentinel lymph node: first lymph node encountered in lymphatic basin that receives lymph from region of primary lesion; biopsy—generally performed in patients with lesions of intermediate thickness (\>1 mm); associated with false-negative rate of 5% to 6% and negative predictive value of 98%; also recommended for patients with thin lesions with negative modifier (eg, ulceration) and when discrepancy occurs between Clark and Breslow staging
Systemic therapy: interferon—significantly prolongs disease-free and overall survival; commonly used for younger patients with positive sentinel nodes; associated with significant adverse effects and decreased quality of life (duration of treatment typically 1 yr); interleukin 2 (IL-2)—response rate relatively low, but 82% of responsive patients have disease-free survival of 39 to 148 mo; dacarbazine (DTIC; imidazole carboxamide)—common chemotherapeutic agent associated with response rates of 15% to 20%; soft-tissue disease more likely to respond; effect lasts 3 to 6 mo; <5% of patients have complete remission
Immunotherapy (experimental): vaccine against melanoma-associated antigen elicits immunologic response; treatment may be combined with IL-2; research ongoing; excellent response in some patients; spontaneous regression—immunologic responsiveness of melanomas leaves open possibility of partial or complete regression without therapy
MANAGEMENT OF ADRENAL INCIDENTALOMA ----- David R. Farley, MD, Professor of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
Adrenal tumors: functional tumors may secrete aldosterone, cortisol, androgens or estrogens, or epinephrine and norepinephrine; assessment of functionality important before attempting resection; anatomy—right adrenal gland located directly posterior to inferior vena cava; left adrenal gland located behind pancreas, directly posterior to splenic vessels
Imaging: computed tomography (CT) measures density in Hounsfield units (H); water (0 H) important reference point; contrast may increase density; benign cysts generally have density near 0 H; benign myelolipomas less dense than water (eg, -50 H); cortical adenomas (functional or nonfunctional), 10 to 20 H; increasing density (\>30 H) suggestive of malignancy; benign tumors—typically small (1-3 cm), homogeneous, with friendly borders; malignancies—typically larger (\>10 cm on average), heterogeneous, with irregular borders
Differential diagnosis: aldosteronoma; neuroblastoma; pheochromocytoma; metastasis; cortical adenoma; adrenocortical carcinoma; incidentaloma
Presentation: 2% to 4% of hospitalized patients have adrenal masses (incidence increases with age); adrenal masses discovered incidentally by various imaging modalities (eg, ultrasonography, angiography, magnetic resonance imaging), depending on initial presentation (eg, recurrent urinary tract infections, hypertension); history and physical examination—look for signs and symptoms suggestive of functionality (eg, headaches, hypertension, change in weight, malaise, diabetes, hirsutism); ask about family history (eg, conditions suggestive of multiple endocrine neoplasia); laboratory studies—include cortisol level, catecholamines, and potassium level
Diagnosis: Conn’s syndrome—primary aldosteronism results in hypertension, hypokalemia, and slight hypernatremia; serum levels of potassium and aldosterone important for diagnosis; renin level in urine also useful; small mass visible with abdominal CT; laparoscopic adrenalectomy may cure; pheochromocytoma—95% of patients have hypertension (episodic or chronic); diaphoresis and flushing may occur; family history important; urinary levels of fractionated catecholamines diagnostic; restriction of expanding adrenal medulla by cortex results in round or egg- shaped mass visible on CT; metastasis—prostate, breast, and lung cancers commonly metastasize to adrenal glands; if history of cancer, may need to perform imaging to rule out recurrence of primary; neuroblastoma— relatively common in young children, but rare in adults; large painless abdominal mass; prognosis partly depends on age; CT and catecholamine levels important for diagnosis and for directing intervention; primary malignancy— adrenocortical carcinomas typically produce high dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), but low level does not rule out; CT shows large mass; benign adrenocortical adenoma—hypercortisolism may result in hypertension, obesity, and diabetes; removal of mass may correct comorbidities; uncommon; incidentaloma—diagnosis of exclusion; incidental radiologic finding; asymptomatic nonfunctional adrenal mass
Management of incidentalomas: experience at Mayo Clinic included \>61,000CT scans (patients with mass <1 cm or history of cancer excluded); 342 adrenal masses 1 cm found (more common in women; average age, 62 yr); average size of adrenal mass, 2.5 cm (range 1-11 cm); 55 patients underwent surgery for concerning lesions; 5 had pheochromocytomas, 4 had adrenocortical carcinomas, 2 had cortisol-secreting adenomas, and 1 had metastasis of unidentified primary cancer; 287 patients diagnosed with incidentaloma; 251 of these followed for 1 yr (no changes seen); conclusion—risk for malignancy increases with size of incidentaloma; recommendations—work up all adrenal nodules \>1 cm (looking for functionality); resect all incidentalomas \>3 to 4 cm; reassess smaller incidentalomas at 3 to 6 mo, looking for changes; long-term follow-up—87 patients followed for \>4 yr; CT repeated to assess changes; 4 patients underwent surgery for growth (1 cm) of incidentaloma; no cancers or functional tumors found
Resection: laparoscopy gold standard, but open surgery recommended if malignancy suspected; surgical intervention appropriate for functional tumors and those \>3 cm (other factors, eg, “cancer phobia,” considered); approaches—anterior approaches more common than posterior; speaker prefers open approach via subcostal incision for adrenocortical, renal cell, or hepatocellular cancers, for large tumors (\>8 cm if confirmed benign; \>5-6 cm if possibility of malignancy), in patients with coagulopathy, and in those undergoing reoperation; laparoscopic technique (anterior or posterior approach) good for smaller benign tumors
NOVEL THERAPEUTICS AND DIAGNOSTICS IN MELANOMA ----- Richard Essner, MD, Assistant Director, Surgical Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint Johns Health Center, Santa Monica, CA
Treating patients with late-stage disease: improvements in surgical techniques and intensive care unit (ICU) practices have led to increased survival (median of 22 mo for patients undergoing surgery vs 9 mo for patients undergoing nonsurgical treatment); staging—accuracy of staging improved by newer imaging techniques; whole- body positron emission tomography (PET) provides 3-D imaging and identifies sites of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake not seen with conventional imaging
Cytoreductive surgery: shown to reduce tumor volume (evidenced by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction [RTPCR]); tumor volume—reduction through resection and other methods important for immunologic management
Disease progression: review of \>4000 patients managed by variety of methods; 1574 patients underwent surgical treatment for stage IV melanoma; 26% of patients with early-stage disease (and 14% of patients with lesions <1 mm thick) developed distant metastases; resection—most patients had single metastasis (rarely, \>4 sites resected); most common sites included lung, subcutaneous tissue, brain, gastrointestinal (GI) tract, liver, and kidneys; survival—patients with metastases of GI tract (primarily, small bowel), lungs, subcutaneous tissue, or distant lymph nodes had median survival \>30 mo; surgery often contraindicated in patients with metastases inadrenal gland, brain, or liver (multiple metastases common); complete resection required to achieve therapeutic benefit
Factors predictive of positive outcome: early stage of disease; absence of nodal involvement; disease-free interval (time between staging and metastasis) 36 mo; “low-risk” sites of metastasis (lung, GI tract, subcutaneous tissue) or number of metastases
Other factors that may influence prognosis: tumor doubling time 60 days; ease of removal; serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; high levels associated with poor outcome); S100- β proteins (higher levels possible negative predictor); tumor-associated 90-kd glycoprotein antigen (TA90) immune complex (not yet verified); IL-13 and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), but cytokines not specific to malignancies and levels vary
Reverse transcriptase PCR: sensitive method for identifying small volume of tumor cells (by amplifying melanoma-related markers); attempts to correlate with serum levels of tyrosinase have had inconsistent results
Immunotherapies: IL-2—T-cell activating protein, given as bolus or continuous infusion, boosts immune response to melanoma; response rate, 10% to 15%; lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells—harvested autologous killer cells activated with IL-2; tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)—T cells harvested from tumor, combined with IL-2 or interferon; response rates—relatively low for patients with melanoma (although Food and Drug Administration [FDA]-approved for advanced melanoma); high doses of IL-2 may cause capillary leak syndrome, necessitating ICU care
Chemotherapy: DTIC has long history of use; combination therapy with IL-2 or interferon (known as biochemotherapy) not shown to improve benefit

Suggested Reading

Bovio S et al: Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series. J Endocrinol Invest 29:298, 2006; Brunaud L et al: Observation or laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal incidentaloma? A surgical decision analysis. Med Sci Monit 12:CR355, 2006; Castillo OA et al: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for suspected metastasis of adrenal glands: our experience. Urology 69:637, 2007; Cohen PR et al: The purse-string suture revisited: a useful technique for the closure of cutaneous surgical wounds. Int J Dermatol 46:341, 2007; Edwards-Dawn M et al: Mohs surgery for the treatment of melanoma in situ: a review. Dermatol Surg 33:395, 2007; Kebebew E et al: Extent of disease at presentation and outcome for adrenocortical carcinoma: have we made progress? World J Surg 30:872, 2006; Libe R et al: Adrenocortical cancer: pathophysiology and clinical management. Endocr Relat Cancer 14:13, 2007; MacNeil S: Progress and opportunities for tissue-engineered skin. Nature 445:874; Mathieu D et al: Gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of malignant melanoma brain metastases. Neurosurgery 60:471, 2007; Meyer A, Behrend M: Indications and results of surgery for incidentally found adrenal tumors. Urol Int 77:173, 2006; Mocellin S et al: Sentinel lymph node molecular ultrastaging in patients with melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognosis. J Clin Oncol 25:1588, 2007; Samlowski WE et al: Multimodality treatment of melanoma brain metastases incorporating sterotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Cancer 109:1855, 2007; Steels E et al: Long-term benefit of combined radiofrequency ablation and surgery in a patient with AJCC stage IV metastatic melanoma. Clin Exp Dermatol 32:100, 2007; Taylor RC et al: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict sentinel lymph node positivity in patients with cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 25:869, 2007; Toniato A et al: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: is it really more difficult? A surgical decision analysis. Surg Endosc [epub ahead of print], 2007.

Educational Objectives

The goal of this program is to improve the management of melanoma and adrenal incidentaloma. After hearing and assimilating this program, the clinician will be better able to:
1. Describe anatomic classification and microstaging systems for melanoma.
2. Determine appropriate excisional margins for melanoma lesions.
3. Identify patients for whom sentinel lymph node biopsy or therapeutic lymph node resection is appropriate.
4. Identify patients likely to benefit from surgical management of adrenal incidentalomas and discuss the recommendations for open and laparoscopic approaches.
5. Compare the surgical and nonsurgical options for treating patients with melanoma.

Faculty Disclosure

In adherence to ACCME Standards for Commercial Support, Audio-Digest requires all faculty members to disclose relevant financial relationships within the past 12 months that might create any personal conflicts of interest. Any identified conflicts were resolved to ensure that this educational activity promotes quality in health care and not a proprietary business or commercial interest. For this program, the following has been disclosed: Dr. Essner is on the advisory board of Schering-Plough.

Acknowledgements

Drs. Cole and Farley were recorded at 35th Annual Postgraduate Course in Surgery, sponsored by the Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Surgery, and held April 27-29, 2006, in Charleston, SC; Dr. Essner was recorded at Current Concepts in General Surgery and Trauma Update, sponsored by the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Department of Surgery and Office of Continuing Medical Education, and held September 6- 8, 2006, in Albuquerque, NM. The Audio-Digest Foundation thanks the speakers and the sponsors for their cooperation in the production of this program.

Reproduction of this summary in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

If, after reviewing this written summary, you would like to hear the contents and/or earn CME/CE credit:

View Main Program Listing

Visit Audio-Digest Home Page