Audio-Digest Foundation: general-surgery

Main Written Summaries Listing | General-surgery: 2007 Listings
Audio-Digest FoundationGeneral Surgery


Volume 54, Issue 16
August 21, 2007

The following is an abstracted summary, not a verbatim transcript, of the lectures/discussions on this audio program. If, after reviewing this written summary, you would like to hear the contents and/or earn CME/CE credit:

View Main Program Listing

Visit Audio-Digest Home Page

General Surgery Program InfoAccreditation InfoCultural & Linguistic Competency Resources





IBD SURGERY

OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT OF ANORECTAL CROHN’S DISEASEAnn Lowry, MD, Adjunct Professor of Surgery, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis
Points to remember: symptoms may not always match appearance of anus; anorectal disease can predate proximal bowel disease and intestinal symptoms; anorectal Crohn’s disease may mimic more common problems, eg, anorectal fissure
Diagnostic hints: multiple lesions; fissures in atypical locations; fissures or hemorrhoids associated with stricture in patient with no history of surgery; nonhealing ulcers; bluish tinge to perianal skin; large edematous skin tags; discrepancy between symptoms and appearance
Fissures: in one series, 20% located laterally (60% posterior); one-third of patients had multiple fissures; often deep, with undermined edges; often painless, despite appearance; if asymptomatic, treatment not necessary; in some series, 80% heal spontaneously; if painful, suspect associated perianal sepsis; treatment—includes controlling bowel habits and use of topical agents, including metronidazole; anecdotal evidence supports use of oral antibiotics; if symptoms persist without sepsis, consider lateral internal sphincterotomy (associated with high risk for incontinence; use with caution)
Hemorrhoids: rare in individuals with Crohn’s disease; often confused with skin tags or edema; avoid hemorrhoidectomy, due to high morbidity (poor wound healing, stenosis, increased risk for proctectomy); try symptomatic treatment first, including control of diarrhea or constipation, sitz baths, and topical therapy; exception—persistent internal prolapsing hemorrhoids that do not respond to control of bowel movements; rubber band ligation recommended
Fistulae: American Gastroenterological Association recommends empiric classification distinguishing simple and complex fistulae
Simple: low, with single external opening, and no sign of concomitant problem; treatment recommendations— include fistulotomy; healing rates good, but associated with high risk for incontinence, proctectomy, and long- term diversion
Complex: high, with multiple external openings; may have had associated separation, rectovaginal fistula, anorectal stricture, or active Crohn’s disease in rectum; more common than simple fistulae; treatment recommendations—include placement of noncutting seton, with long-term drainage (however, many patients need second seton or proctectomy); other suggested treatments include antibiotics (eg, metronidazole, ciprofloxacin), azathioprine, or 6-mercaptopurine; tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α monoclonal antibodies (infliximab) now being studied (Crohn’s disease associated with elevations in TNF-α activity); in recent study of patients receiving infliximab in dose of 5 mg/kg, 68% experienced >50% reduction in draining fistulae (55% with complete closure), but median closure duration only 3 mo after stopping infliximab; 11% of patients developed perianal abscesses, likely due to persistence of subcutaneous tracts; later study suggested that induction plus maintenance therapy superior to induction alone; cyclosporine and tacrolimus also studied
Procedure at University of Minnesota: drain sepsis, insert noncutting seton, and start antibiotics; when local sepsis controlled, trial of infliximab, with seton removed after second infusion if patient responds; continuing use of antibiotics and infliximab questionable; if patient does not respond to infliximab, leave seton and consider other biologic agents; consider surgery for patients who do not improve and do not have proctitis; with proctitis, leave seton, continue medical management, and consider proctectomy if symptoms warrant
Management principles: maintain high index of suspicion; diagnose with care; tailor therapy to specific symptoms; symptom relief main goal
CURRENT SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF CROHN’S DISEASE—Victor W. Fazio, MD, Professor of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, and Rupert Turnbull Chair, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
Indications for surgery: failure of medical therapy; obstruction; fistula abscess; hemorrhage
Most common disease patterns: disease of small bowel, small and large bowel, and large bowel alone account for 95% of indications; rare exceptions include oral, esophageal, or ectopic Crohn’s disease
Failure of medical therapy: rarely primary indication; usually associated with colon disease; advent of anti-TNF- α agents has expanded pool of patients eligible for reconstructive surgery
Preparation for surgery: use imaging methods to develop “road map”; for small bowel, computed tomographic (CT) enterography current state-of-art (usually performed when extraintestinal problems suspected); most patients with complicated disease (includes risk for sepsis) benefit from stoma site marker before surgery, when optimal site can be chosen; stoma possibility for any patient with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); consider withdrawing immunosuppressive agents before surgery (immunocompromise may impair healing); if not possible, consider covering stoma in cases involving corrective surgery with anastomosis; evidence accumulating that mechanical bowel preparation does not reduce rates of sepsis and anastomotic leaks; speaker suggests taking patient off solid food for 2 to 3 days before surgery, then dealing with residual obstructions on operating table; during surgery, administer intravenous (IV) antibiotics and stress-dose steroids; nasogastric tubes no longer used during elective surgery, but Foley catheters “de rigueur;” consider ureteric stents for reoperative abdominal surgery; most ureteric complications result from failure to identify injury during surgery; prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis
Proportion of patients with small-bowel Crohn’s disease who undergo surgery: 50% at 5 yr; 70% at 10 yr; results similar for colitis; with iliac colitis, 75% at 5 yr and 90% at 10 yr
Planning for surgery: Crohn’s disease recurrent and in-curable; strategic approach required over patient’s lifetime; within 20 yr, 50% to 60% of patients have surgery (some patients have 3-4 resections by 15-20 yr); sometimes, recurrence downstream of original anastomosis; implication—1 in 6 patients with small-bowel disease eventually needs ostomy; anticipate eventual need for stoma (use midline rather than paramedian incisions)
Bowel and colon economy: colon economy reduces risk for postoperative dehydration; address stricture formation
Indications for colon surgery: failure to thrive; perianal disease; toxic megacolon; toxic colitis
Margins for small-bowel surgery: establish at macroscopic margin of clearance (requires palpation of mesenteric margin; shift from thick to thin margin demarcates presence and absence of disease); avoid leaving strictures or seriously ulcerated bowel; no advantage to taking >2 to 3 cm; also no advantage to frozen sections
Complications: bowel obstruction—nearly all cases resolve with conservative therapy (IV fluids, steroids); can then assess need for further treatment; chronic colon obstruction—treatments include resection, bypass, and stricturoplasty; resection usually preferred; conditions simulating Crohn’s disease include tuberculosis, lymphoma, and adenocarcinoma; intra-abdominal abscesses—major types interloop, mesenteric, pelvic, and extraperitoneal
Mesenteric abscess: hardest to treat; results from mesenteric bowel margin perforating into leaves of small-bowel mesentery; pus collects, vessels fragment, and hematoma can spread to duodenum; treat by draining and excluding mesentery
Other types of fistulae: organs of origin include small bowel, colon, and rectum; may ulcerate and penetrate into target organs, including vagina, bladder, and sigmoid colon; management—excise diseased segment; repair target organ; omental interposition recommended to prevent recurrence; for psoas abscess, CT enterography especially helpful in developing road map; drain active sepsis ahead of time; control active disease; perform surgery few weeks after drainage; consider temporary stoma if warranted; occult psoas abscess—may be identified on CT, but undetectable at surgery; explore psoas sheath with large-bore aspirating needle; colonic disease—pancolectomy and end- ileostomy treatment of choice; major perineal sepsis, malnutrition, and toxic states indicate subtotal colectomy; 30% to 50% of patients develop unhealed perineal wound requiring more surgery; however, stapling anorectal stump interferes with later biopsy collection (4%- 5% of patients develop cancer); also, abscess may develop at staple line
Laparoscopic surgery: sometimes used for pancolectomy and ileostomy; contraindications include toxic states due to fragility of colon
Management of rectosigmoid stump: staple; exteriorize; create mucus fistula
Ileorectal anastomosis: disease often spares rectum; even if rectum involved, surgery feasible if adjuvant therapies available (provided rectum distensible, with no evidence of other disease); other contraindications include active perianal sepsis and significant small-bowel disease (markers for early recurrence)
Megacolon and toxic colitis: consider fulminant if >2 indicators present (tachycardia, fever, elevated white blood cell count, albumin <3 g%); in these cases, do not wait for sigmoid stump to mature; with subtotal colectomy, part of sigmoid colon left behind, so it can be exteriorized, wrapped in gauze, and amputated after 5 to 7 days; mature it as mucus fistula
INFLIXIMAB, CYCLOSPORINE, STEROIDS: WHEN ENOUGH IS ENOUGH IN ULCERATIVE COLITIS— John H. Pemberton, MD, Professor of Surgery, Mayo College of Medicine, the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Problem: patient with active disease and management failing
Adequate management: outpatient—standard treatment includes aspirin, oral or topical steroids, and azathioprine; infliximab (some evidence of symptom control); end point clear (“if you can’t steroid-spare, then enough is enough”); inpatient—IV high-dose prednisone; possibly cyclosporine; infliximab; distinguish between fulminant and acute disease
Fulminant disease (inpatients): high stool frequency (>10/day); continuous bleeding; fever; tachycardia; patient unstable, requires transfusion; colon at least slightly dilated, with tenderness and possibly early peritoneal signs; treatment—establish diagnosis; colectomy indicated for unstable patients; treat stable patients with high-dose steroids; if patient responds within 2 to 3 days, progress to cyclosporine; if not, go to surgery
Acute disease (inpatients): administer high-dose steroids for 5 days; if no response, go to surgery, or try cyclosporine or infliximab; surgery indicated if patient does not respond to infliximab and steroid-sparing impossible
Problems associated with hospitalization for severe ulcerative colitis: malnutrition; debilitation; timing; adverse effects of medication; longstanding anticolectomy bias among gastroenterologists
Surgery
Ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA): performed in >80% of cases; now accomplished through minimally invasive techniques; associated with better quality of life (QOL) scores, compared to patients with chronic ulcerative colitis; reasons—removes disease; avoids stoma; function predictably good over 22 to 24 yr; virtually eliminates risk for malignancy associated with chronic ulcerative colitis
Experience with IPAA at Mayo Clinic: nearly 3000 patients (2400 for ulcerative colitis); median follow-up time 11 yr (maximum 24 yr); 92% chance that pouch will be in place and functioning at 21 yr; in cohort of 409 patients followed over 20 yr, QOL did not change “as they aged along with their pouch”; conclusion—IPAA viable operation associated with good QOL and predictable stable outcome over time; continually evolving (now performed laparoscopically, either completely or hand-assisted)
Dysplasia: still poorly understood; often not recognized or appreciated by gastroenterologists; data complicated by high dropout rate among patients in surveillance studies; random colon biopsies unreliable; “holding on” to patient with even low-grade dysplasia may be dangerous
Deciding when enough is enough: outpatients—in conjunction with gastroenterologists, determine when delaying surgery no longer tenable; inpatients—after short course of aggressive treatment (IV steroids, infliximab), use presence of bleeding and multiple daily stools as evidence of fulminant disease and indication for surgery; deteriorating patients—surgeon and gastroenterologist determine together when surgery warranted; high-grade dysplasia—indication for surgery by itself; “maybe even low-grade as well”

Suggested Reading

Cendan JC, Behrns KE: Associated neoplastic disease in inflammatory bowel disease. Surg Clin North Am 87:659, 2007; Cima RR, Pemberton JH: Medical and surgical management of chronic ulcerative colitis. Arch Surg 140:300, 2005; Colombel JF et al: Early postoperative complications are not increased in patients with Crohn’s disease treated perioperatively with infliximab or immunosuppressive therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 99:878, 2004; Colombel JF et al: Management of Crohn’s disease of the ileoanal pouch with infliximab. Am J Gastroenterol 98:2239, 2003; Hahnloser D et al: Results at up to 20 years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 94:333, 2007; Larson DW, Pemberton JH: Current concepts and controversies in surgery for IBD. Gastroenterology 126:1611, 2004; Penninckx F et al: Success and failure after repair of rectovaginal fistula in Crohn’s disease: analysis of prognostic factors. Colorectal Dis 3:406, 2001;Reese GE et al: The effect of Crohn’s disease on outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 50:239, 2007; Sachar DB: Indications for surgery in Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 102 Suppl 1:S76, 2007; Sandborn WJ et al: AGA technical review on perianal Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 125:1508, 2003; Scarpa M et al: Systematic review of dysplasia after restorative proctocolecomy for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 94:534, 2007; Schaus BJ et al: Clinical features of ileal pouch polyps in patients with underlying ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:832, 2007; Strong SA, Fazio VW: Surgical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 15:326, 1999; Topstad DR et al: Combined seton placement, infliximab infusion, and maintenance immunosuppressives improve healing rate in fistulizing anorectal Crohn’s disease: a single center experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46:577, 2003; Vader JP et al: Appropriate treatment for Crohn’s disease: methodology and summary results of a multidisciplinary international expert panel approach—EPACT. Digestion 73:237, 2006.

Educational Objectives

The goal of this program is to improve medical and surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease. After hearing and assimilating this program, the listener will be able to:
Recognize and treat fissures, hemorrhoids, and fistulae in patients with anorectal Crohn’s disease.
Develop principles for the surgical management of anorectal Crohn’s disease.
Identify indications for surgery in patients with Crohn’s disease.
Maintain surveillance for and manage the most likely complications of Crohn’s disease surgery.
Determine when a patient with ulcerative colitis should undergo colectomy.

Faculty Disclosure

In adherence to ACCME Standards for Commercial Support, Audio-Digest requires all faculty members to disclose relevant financial relationships within the past 12 months that might create any personal conflicts of interest. Any identified conflicts were resolved to ensure that this educational activity promotes quality in health care and not a proprietary business or commercial interest. For this program, the following has been disclosed: Dr. Fazio has received grant funding from Genzyme.

Acknowledgements

Drs. Lowry and Pemberton spoke at Colon and Rectal Surgery, held September 7-9, 2006, in Minneapolis, MN, and sponsored by the University of Minnesota Medical School, Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, Ltd, and the Minnesota Colon and Rectal Foundation. Dr. Fazio was recorded at the Phoenix Surgical Symposium, held February 14- 17, 2007, in Phoeniz, AZ, and sponsored by Banner Health and the Phoenix Surgical Society. The Audio-Digest Foundation thanks the speakers and the sponsors for their cooperation in the production of this program.

Reproduction of this summary in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

If, after reviewing this written summary, you would like to hear the contents and/or earn CME/CE credit:

View Main Program Listing

Visit Audio-Digest Home Page