CANCER IN THE FAMILY/PANCREATIC CANCER
Educational Objectives
| The goal of this program is to emphasize the role of genetics in determining a patients risk for cancer and to improve
the management of pancreatic cancer. After hearing and assimilating this program, the participant will be better able
to:
|
 | 1. Recognize the risk factors for inherited predisposition to cancer and describe the major mutations causing
breast, colon, and other cancers.
|
 | 2. Choose the appropriate therapeutic strategy for patients with BRCA mutations, Cowden disease, Li-Fraumeni
syndrome, and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).
|
 | 3. Describe the role and benefits of genetic counseling in the management of patients with suspected inherited
predisposition to cancer.
|
 | 4. Summarize the contributions of recent advances in molecular genetics, diagnosis and staging, surgical procedures,
and adjuvant therapies in improving mortality of patients with pancreatic cancer.
|
 | 5. Employ surgical modifications that reduce blood loss and improve operative mortality during resection of pancreatic
cancers.
|
Faculty Disclosure
In adherence to ACCME Standards for Commercial Support, Audio-Digest requires all faculty and members of the
planning committee to disclose relevant financial relationships within the past 12 months that might create any personal
conflicts of interest. Any identified conflicts were resolved to ensure that this educational activity promotes
quality in health care and not a proprietary business or commercial interest. For this program, Ms. Ballinger, Dr.
Reber, and the planning committee reported nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgements
Ms. Ballingers lecture was recorded at Current Concepts in General Surgery 2008, held September 3-5, 2008, in Albuquerque,
NM, and sponsored by the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Department of Surgery,
and Office of Continuing Medical Education. Dr. Reber addressed the Kaiser Permanente 4th Annual National Surgical
Symposium, held April 2-4, 2008, in Ojai, CA, and sponsored by Kaiser Permanente, Southern California Permanente
Medical Group Physician and Professional Education. The Audio-Digest Foundation thanks the speakers and
the sponsors for their cooperation in the production of this program.
Evaluation of Patients for Familial Cancer Risk
Lori L. Ballinger , MS, Senior Genetic Counselor, University of New Mexico Cancer Research and Treatment Center,
Albuquerque
| Cancers with inherited components: include breast, breast/ovarian, colon, renal, melanoma, thyroid, and gastric
cancers; genetic component found in 5% to 10% of all malignancies, including leukemias; individuals with predisposition
to inherited cancers have higher lifetime risk of developing cancer at earlier age; highly penetrant mutations
cause large burden in afflicted families; many genes increase risk for multiple types of cancer; surveillance for
cancer in high-risk families different from that in general population; surgical interventions efficacious in reducing
risk for inherited cancer
|
| Patients at risk: individuals who have 2 relatives on same side of family with cancer; inherited predisposition suggested
by early onset, presence of multiple types of cancer (eg, colon and endometrial cancers), and bilateral cancers
(except ovarian)
|
| Genetics: most syndromes inherited as autosomal dominant mutations with reduced penetrance (ie, percentage of
patients with mutation who develop disease); phenotype may appear to skip generations
|
| Breast cancer: multiple syndromes; BRCAcarriers have 50% to 85% risk for breast cancer; greatly increases
risk for ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers; men who carry mutation have 100-fold higher risk for breast
cancer than general population and are at increased risk for early-onset prostate cancer and pancreatic cancer;
Cowden disease (PTEN mutation)35% rate of breast cancer, with increased risk for endometrial and thyroid
cancers and renal malformation; no increase in rate of ovarian cancer; hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (CDH1
mutation)40% risk for lobular cancer, signet-ring cell carcinoma of colon, and diffuse gastric cancers; Li-
Fraumeni syndrome (p53 or TP53 mutations)25% to 30% lifetime risk for breast cancer and increased risk for
hematologic cancers, sarcomas, soft tissue sarcomas, and bone, brain, and adrenocortical cancers; rate for second
primary breast cancer, 40% to 60% per year (compared to 1%-20% in general population)
|
 | BRCA mutations: prophylactic mastectomy in unaffected carriers reduces risk for breast cancer by 90%; in
women with breast cancer, bilateral mastectomy reduces risk for second primary breast cancer; removal of ovaries
by 40 yr of age reduces risk for breast cancer by 50% (short-term hormone replacement therapy [HRT] beneficial
for such patients); prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy reduces risk for ovarian cancer by
>95% when guidelines of Society of Gynecological Oncologists followed (include removal of ovaries, remnants
and ovarian ligament, plus or minus peritoneal washings, and examination of abdominal cavity for occult
ovarian cancers, which occur at rate of 3%-11% in women ≈40 yr of age)
|
 | Cowden disease: multiple cutaneous and mucosal hamartomas (disorganized but not dysplastic tissues) in colon,
mouth, nose, face, and tongue; increased risk for other cancers and for benign glial mass of cerebellum (Lhermitte-Duclos
disease)
|
 | Li-Fraumeni syndrome: patients with TP53 mutations have highest risk for breast followed by bone and brain cancers;
suggested by presence of soft tissue sarcoma in family history; patients have 85% to 93% lifetime risk of
developing cancer and higher risk for second primary cancers resulting from radiation or chemotherapy
|
| Colon cancer: associated with many syndromes; 6% prevalence of colon cancer in general population
|
 | Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): polyps may develop in individuals as young as 10 yr of age; also associated
with higher risk for extracolonic tumors, eg, upper gastrointestinal (GI) tumors, desmoids, osteomas (Gardners
variant); identical to Gardners syndrome; adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutations also associated with
brain tumors (Turcot variant), eg, glioblastoma; mutations in Turcot variant of Lynch syndrome associated with
medulloblastomas
|
 | Surgical management: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend considering
colectomy if polyp burden >20, some polyps >1 cm in size, or advanced histology found in any polyp; untreated
polyposis carries 100% risk for cancer; some patients with many polyps (but not frank polyposis) may have mutations
in same gene as FAP; mutations near 3- or 5-end of gene may cause attenuated form of FAP with fewer
colonic adenomas; important to count polyps, due to high degree of variability within families; upper GI
lesionsin fundic gland, polyps and duodenal adenomas common; testing recommended if >20 cumulative adenomas;
polyp burden determines need for colectomy; attenuated phenotype can result from mutations in APC
gene or in autosomal recessive inherited cancer syndromes, eg, MutYH (MYH)-associated polyposis (MAP)
|
 | Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC): syndrome involves multiple cancers; synonymous with Lynch
syndrome; confers highest risk for colorectal cancer, followed by endometrial cancer (often sentinel cancer in
women, with age at onset several years earlier than that of colon cancer); occurs predominantly on right side;
20% risk for stomach cancer; pancreatic and other biliary tree cancers seen; also transitional cell, uroepithelial,
and ovarian cancers occur at rate of 10%; histopathologic examination important for diagnosis because not all
patients present with usual criteria (eg, presence of colon cancer at <50 yr of age, or 3 affected family members);
suggested by mucinous, signet-ring type of histopathology, Crohns-like inflammation, and tumor-infiltrating
lymphocytes
|
 | Management of Lynch syndrome: perform colonoscopy every 1 to 2 yr because Lynch syndrome involves defect in
DNA mismatch repair, and cancer-causing mutations accumulate rapidly; perform upper endoscopy every 2 yr,
beginning at 30 yr of age; perform endometrial ultrasonography and biopsy every year, beginning at 25 yr of age;
remove reproductive organs from women after childbearing completed (patients may have HRT until 45-50 yr of
age); perform urine cytology annually to detect transitional cell carcinomas of uroepithelial tissues; colectomy is
option in patients with cancer phobia, those who do not comply with screening, and those who have existing colon
cancer (18% of patients with Lynch syndrome have synchronous and 30%-45% have metachronous colon
cancer)
|
 | Juvenile polyposis: children have associated dysmorphology and abnormalities of heart or malrotation of gut; appearance
of juvenile polyps different from that of adenomatous polyps; can occur in adults; often mistaken for
hyperplastic polyps on pathologic examination
|
 | Other inherited syndromes increasing risk for colon cancer: hereditary diffuse gastric cancerincreases risk for
signet-ring cell carcinoma of colon as well as breast cancer; hyperplastic polyposis syndrome; familial colon cancer
syndrome Xcriteria include 3 family members with colon cancer (one first-degree relative of other 2), 2
generations affected, 1 cancer diagnosed before 50 yr of age; patients do not have mutations in genes associated
with Lynch syndrome; hereditary mixed polyposis syndromespatients have hyperplastic polyps, juvenile polyps,
and adenomas, alone or in combination
|
| Genetic risk assessment (counseling): pretest and posttest counseling standard of care for any family undergoing
genetic testing; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), American Society of Clinical
Oncologists, and Society of Gynecological Oncologists recommend counseling to obtain 3-generational pedigree
to assess risk, educate patients about genetics and individual risk, choose appropriate test(s), explain test procedure,
risks, benefits and limitations, and discuss alternatives to testing and management options
|
| Genetic counselors: trained in medical genetics, counseling, conveying complex information to patients, and assessing
family history; familiar with available tests; interpret test results; formulate follow-up plans with patients
and other at-risk family members
|
| Questions and answers: legislation to prevent genetic discriminationNew Mexico has legislation prohibiting
use of genetic information to exclude applicant from health insurance; prohibits demand for genetic information by
employers and performance of genetic testing without employees knowledge; similar to Genetic Information Nondiscrimination
Act (GINA); genetic discrimination defined as discrimination against individuals without disease
who have genetic predisposition
|
Pancreatic Cancer: No Room for Nihilism
Howard A. Reber, MD, Professor of Surgery, and Chief of Gastrointestinal Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine
at the University of California, Los Angeles
| Background: 38,000 new cases of pancreatic cancer expected in the United States this year; death rate from pancreatic
cancer fourth highest among cancers and second highest among GI cancers (after colorectal cancer); >37,000
cases reported in United States in 2007
|
| Molecular genetic advances: patients who show progression from normal cuboidal to columnar epithelium in
pancreatic duct, with continued loss of architecture, develop pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN1 or
PanIN2); PanIN3 formerly called carcinoma in situ; next stage involves invasive pancreatic cancer; morphologic
changes accompanied by changes at molecular level; information about genesis and evolution of disease may enable
earlier detection and more effective treatment with pharmaceuticals targeted to genes or their products
|
| Advances in diagnosis and staging: helical computed tomography (CT)can determine resectability of pancreatic
neoplasm, revealing presence or absence of liver metastasis and assessing extent of vascular invasion; resection
possible in >90% of patients with grade 1 and 50% with grade 2 levels of vascular involvement; almost no tumors
in patients with grades 3 or 4 disease resectable
|
 | Operative mortality: most patients receive either standard or pylorus-preserving Whipple operations; previously,
rate of operative mortality for standard Whipple operation approached 20% to 25%, with even lower rates of success;
currently, operative mortality <5%; lowest mortality associated with most experienced surgeons and centers
|
 | Surgical outcomes: 50% of patients who survive 5 yr after surgery will eventually die from disease; 5-yr rates of
survival range from 7% to 20%
|
 | Reduction of operative blood loss: high level of blood loss during cancer surgery may negatively affect prognosis
after resection of many cancers; may result from immunosuppressive effects of blood loss and transfusion; studies
report efforts to limit blood loss resulted in decrease from mean of 700 mL to 400 mL per Whipple operation;
among 200 patients observed, average overall 5-yr rate of survival 27%; those who received surgery before efforts
to reduce blood loss had 16% rate of survival; those with lower loss of blood during surgery had 35% survival
|
| Adjuvant therapies: most patients with pancreatic cancer recommended to receive postsurgical chemotherapy;
role of radiation therapy remains controversial
|
 | Gemcitabine: standard chemotherapeutic agent; study showed statistically significant (but very small) difference between
survival in patients receiving gemcitabine (5.6 mo) vs. 5-fluorouracil (5FU; 4.4 mo); erlotinib (Tarceva)
acts as HER1/EGF receptor antagonist; only agent shown to improve survival when combined with gemcitabine
(from 17% 1-yr survival rate in patients receiving gemcitabine plus placebo to 24% in patients receiving gemcitabine
plus erlotinib); gemcitabine plus erlotinib currently recommended as first-line therapy
|
 | Chemoradiation: studypatients with resected pancreatic cancer randomized to groups undergoing observation
(no adjuvant therapy), chemoradiation therapy, chemotherapy, or chemoradiation plus chemotherapy; found no
statistically significant difference in 5-yr survival among those who had no adjuvant therapy and those who had
chemoradiation, with or without chemotherapy; higher rate of survival (29%) seen among patients receiving chemotherapy
alone
|
 | Down-staging chemotherapy; studyselected group of 25 patients with unresectable tumors underwent chemotherapy
with regimen of 5FU, leucovorin, mitomycin-C, and dipyridamole; 3 patients survived long-term
|
| Questions and answers: correlation of transfusion and blood loss with survivaltransfusion also correlates with
survival (although significance not as high as with blood loss) for unknown reasons; cancers of body and tail of
pancreasrates of survival among patients with cancers of body and tail of pancreas lower because disease presents
later, tumors usually unresectable, and they usually recur; speaker has seen few patients survive 5 yr; data
suggest these tumors similar to those in head of gland at same stage; explanation for higher survival rates after surgery
at speakers institutionhigher survival rates best explained by effects of lower blood loss during surgery
|
Suggested Reading
Al-Sukhni W et al: Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: familial adenomatous polyposis and lynch syndrome. Surg Clin
North Am 88:819, 2008; Borja-Cacho D et al: Molecular targeted therapies for pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 196:430, 2008;
Calva D, Howe JR: Hamartomatous polyposis syndromes. Surg Clin North Am 88:779, 2008; Cartwright T et al:
Cancer of the pancreas: are we making progress? A review of studies in the US Oncology Research Network. Cancer Control
15:308, 2008; Canto MI: Screening and surveillance approaches in familial pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N
Am 18:535, 2008; Chang DK et al: Improving outcomes for operable pancreatic cancer: is access to safer surgery the problem?
J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:1036, 2008; Fleming JL et al: The role of parental and grandparental epigenetic alterations in
familial cancer risk. Cancer Res 68:9116, 2008; Foulkes WD: Inherited susceptibility to common cancers. N Engl J Med
359:2143, 2008; Jatoi I, Anderson WF: Management of women who have a genetic predisposition for breast cancer. Surg
Clin North Am 88:845, 2008; Jensen et al: Inherited pancreatic endocrine tumor syndromes: advances in molecular pathogenesis,
diagnosis, management, and controversies. Cancer 113 (7 Suppl):1807, 2008; Jorgensen MT et al: Familial pancreatic
cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 43:387, 2008; Klapman J, Malafa MP: Early detection of pancreatic cancer: why, who, and
how to screen. Cancer Control 15:280, 2008; Loos M et al: Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. Ann NY Acad Sci
1138:169, 2008; Meckliin JP: The implications of genetics in colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 19 (Suppl 5):v87, 2008; Meiser
B et al: Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies. J Genet Couns 17:434,
2008; Mohamad HB, Appfelstaedt JP: Counseling for male BRCA mutation carriers: a review. Breast 17:441, 2008;
Mueller CM et al: Familial and genetic risk of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. Urol Oncol 26:451, 2008;
Tabori U, Malkin D: Risk stratification in cancer predisposition syndromes: lessons learned from novel molecular developments
in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Cancer Res 68:2053, 2008; Tan DS et al: Hereditary breast cancer: from molecular pathology
to tailored therapies. J Clin Pathol 61:1073, 2008; Turnbull C, Rahman N: Genetic predisposition to breast cancer: past,
present, and future. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 9:321, 2008.
|