Audio-Digest Foundation: internal-medicine

Main Written Summaries Listing | Internal-medicine: 2008 Listings
Audio-Digest FoundationInternal Medicine


Volume 55, Issue 04
February 21, 2008

The following is an abstracted summary, not a verbatim transcript, of the lectures/discussions on this audio program. If, after reviewing this written summary, you would like to hear the contents and/or earn CME/CE credit:

View Main Program Listing

Visit Audio-Digest Home Page

Internal Medicine Program InfoAccreditation InfoCultural & Linguistic Competency Resources





INFECTIOUS DISEASE: MRSA/INFLUENZA

From Orlando Regional Healthcare’s Internal Medicine Conference: The Year in Review

COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS (CA- MRSA)Jose A. Vazquez, MD, Professor of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, and Senior Staff, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
Antimicrobial resistance: CA-MRSA now significant problem for internists; potential mortality
Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aureus: invasive pathogen; produces endocarditis in older adults in community
Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus: 30% to 35% prevalence in large teaching institutions
Hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA): differs from CA-MRSA in virulence, drug susceptibility, and diseases produced
Vancomycin-resistant S aureus (VRSA): currently 7 cases worldwide (5 from southeast Michigan area)
S aureus: frequent cause of skin and soft tissue infections; in diabetic foot infections, cellulitis alone monobacterial infection (S aureus or Streptococcus); responsible for 18% to 20% of blood infections in hospital (>80% of intravenous [IV] line infections)
Progression of MRSA: prevalence 60% to 70% of S aureus infections by 2005, 80% to 90% in Detroit since late 1980s; as result of hospitalization of infected patients, CA-MRSA now causing nosocomial skin and soft tissue infections and disseminated syndromes; types of MRSA—types I-III, HA-MRSA; types IV-V, CA-MRSA; differ in drug susceptibility; also differentiated by Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) gene that codes for virulence factors
“Vancomycin creep”: increase in minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin; now 16 to 18 µg/ mL; as result, vancomycin may not be effective in some MRSA infections; vancomycin-intermediate S aureus (VISA) now termed GISA (glycopeptide-intermediate S aureus); MIC of VRSA up to 64 µg/mL
Heteroresistant S aureus (HR-SA): subpopulations (up to 10%) of GISA (depends on colony used for susceptibility testing); MIC usually <4 µg/mL
Emergence of MRSA: 1960, first isolate; 1998-1999, first described in sports teams and American Indians; 2000-2001, appears in prisons and jails; since 2003-2004, producing disease throughout
Characteristics of CA-MRSA: now called USA300 clone; contains PVL gene for cytotoxin that causes destruction in skin and soft tissue as well as white blood cells in area; rarely found in nasal cavity, but common in axilla and groin; treated with drugs often used in community, eg, some tetracyclines, quinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ); associated with necrotizing and recurrent skin infections; community-acquired pneumonia from MRSA beginning to emerge; overall prevalence 36% in United States (50%-70% in California; 15%-20% in Midwest)
How HA-MRSA differs from CA-MRSA: multidrug resistant; often resistant to clindamycin, gentamicin, and fluoroquinolones; PVL gene rarely present; associated with pneumonia and surgical site and bloodstream infections
Risk factors: recent hospitalization or recent antibiotic use confer highest risk; recent surgery; exposure to infected person (contagion common); chronic illness; imprisonment; hospitalization—within previous 6 mo, risk 3.5 times higher, within 6 to 12 mo, 2.2 times higher; for nursing home residents, risk 2 times higher; study of hospitalized patients400 with skin and soft tissue infections from S aureus; 72% MRSA; 90% admitted with CA-MRSA (99% USA300 clone with PVL gene)
Manifestations: necrotizing disease; disseminated carbuncles and furuncles (often do not respond to therapy or recur when therapy withdrawn); suspect in patient not responding to antibiotic in 24 to 48 hr; presentations—resembles spider bite (necrotic center); necrotizing fasciitis (can advance from carbuncle to fasciitis in 24-48 hr); diagnostic point—susceptibility to clindamycin indicates CA-MRSA; susceptibility of HA-MRSA only 21%
Management recommendations: no guidelines currently
Mild infections:incision and drainage of carbuncles and furuncles, followed by chlorhexidine washes (once daily for 7 days); antibiotic options—clindamycin (450 mg q8h; capsules 150 mg, requiring patient to take 9 daily; problems of compliance; inducible resistance); doxycycline (100 mg bid; speaker’s first choice); TMP-SMZ (2 double-strength tablets bid; potential for sulfonamide allergy); doxycycline may be more effective; evaluate further—have patient return to office in 48 to 72 hr; if response inadequate, reevaluate therapy
More serious infections: outpatient—linezolid (Zyvox; 600 mg bid); resistance absent; inpatient— vancomycin (15 mg/kg q12h); linezolid (600 mg bid or IV); daptomycin (4 mg/kg)
Benefits of early therapy: shorter duration; decreased hospital stay; lower cost; decreased morbidity; appropriate therapy reduces infection-related and all-cause mortality; start early if CA-MRSA suspected
INFLUENZA: OLD DISEASE, NEW CHALLENGES —Jonathan A. McCullers, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Department of Molecular Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, and Associate Member, Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children’s Hospital, Memphis, TN
Clinical features: sudden onset; incubation period typically 2 to 3 days; infectious period varies by age; adults shed virus for 1 day before symptoms appear, highlighting importance of vaccinating health care workers; shedding continues 45 days after onset
Impact on individual: 7 to 15 days of illness; 5 to 6 days of restricted activity; 3 to 4 days of reduced capacity; 3 days of missed work or school
At risk for complications: very young or elderly; most of mortality in patients >65 yr of age; patients with chronic medical conditions—pulmonary, renal, metabolic, and cardiovascular disease (except hypertension); neurologic or neuromuscular disorders; hemoglobinopathies; immunosuppression (eg, HIV infection, cancer chemotherapy, high-dose steroids); others—pregnant women, everyone >50 yr of age, and residents of long-term care facilities
Preventing hospitalization: rationale for focusing on high-risk categories
Vaccination recommendations: from Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Anyone who wants to avoid getting influenza
Anyone at high risk for complications and hospitalization
Pregnant women or women who expect to become pregnant during influenza season
Children <5 yr of age (vectors for spread of disease)
Anyone who can transmit influenza to those at high risk, eg, elderly, health care workers, household contacts of children <5 yr of age (eg, parents, older siblings, nannies)
Problem with approach: influenza remains sixth or seventh leading cause of death in United States; solution may be universal vaccination, beginning with children
Antiviral therapy: 2 major proteins on viral surface; hemagglutinin (HA; allows virus to enter cell; target of antibodies); neuraminidase (NA; cleaves sialic acid, allowing virus to leave cell); also M2 ion channel
Neuraminidase inhibitors: oseltamivir (Tamiflu); zanamivir (Relenza); block neuraminidase and prevent viral budding and spread through respiratory tract; may prevent secondary bacterial pneumonia and otitis media; should be given early in infection
M2-inhibitors: amantadine; rimantadine; block M2 ion channel; prevent viral uncoating; resistance present—in >90% of all influenza viruses in United States during last 2 yr; central nervous system side effects and pharmacokinetic issues also limit utility; 70% of avian influenza viruses naturally resistant
Antigenic shift and drift: drift—minor changes within viral subtype; occurs annually, necessitating changes in vaccine; may cause epidemic; shift—major change produces new subtype; may cause pandemic
Influenza vaccines: 2 currently approved in United States
Trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV): delivered by intramuscular injection; standard “flu shot”; introduced in 1960s; contains killed virus grown in eggs; results in IgG antibodies to virus; recommended for everyone >6 mo of age
Live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV): delivered by nasal spray; introduced in 2003; presents to immune system as would wild-type virus; cold-adapted and temperature sensitive; in addition to IgG immunity, may induce T-cell-based immunity and mucosal IgA antibodies (intercept and neutralize virus at mucosal barrier); replicates efficiently at 25°C (nasopharyngeal temperature); grows poorly at 37° to 39°C (core body temperature in lungs); restrictions—LAIV recommended for healthy persons 5 to 49 yr of age; both vaccines grown in chicken eggs, so contraindicated in people allergic to eggs
Vaccination of health care workers: every major medical group recommends giving free of charge at place of work; overall vaccination rate ranges from 34% in 1997 to 42% in 2005 (“we do a terrible job putting our patients at risk”); CDC said LAIV acceptable (does not transmit among adults)

Suggested Reading

Atmar RL et al: A dose-response evaluation of inactivate influenza vaccine given intranasally and intramuscularly to healthy young adults. Vaccine 25:5367, 2007; Carleton HA et al: Community-adapted methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): population dynamics of an expanding community reservoir of MRSA. J Infect Dis 190:1730, 2004; Charlebois ED et al: Origins of community strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 39:47, 2004; Gold HS et al: Antimicrobial-drug resistance. N Engl J Med 335:1445, 1996; King MD et al: Emergence of community-acquired methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA 300 clone as the predominant cause of skin and soft-tissue infections. Ann Intern Med 144:309, 2006; McCullers JA: Antiviral therapy of influenza. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 14:305, 2005; McCullers JA: Evolution, benefits, and shortcomings of vaccine management. J Manag Care Pharm 13:S2, 2007; McCullers JA: Insights into the interaction between influenza virus and pneumococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev 19:571, 2006; McCullers JA: The clinical need for new antiviral drugs directed against influenza virus. J Infect Dis 193:751, 2006; Naimi TS et al: Comparison of community- and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. JAMA 290:2976, 2003; Pan ES et al: Population dynamics of nasal strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus--and their relation to community-associated disease activity. J Infect Dis 192:811, 2005.

Educational Objectives

The goal of this program is to improve prevention and treatment of community-acquired methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) and influenza. After hearing and assimilating this program, the clinician will be better able to:
1. Diagnose CA-MRSA.
2. Identify the different manifestations of MRSA.
3. Manage patients infected with CA-MRSA.
4. Initiate antiviral therapy in patients infected with influenza.
5. Describe the evolution of influenza and the annual adjustment in vaccine, and administer vaccination to patients at risk for hospitalization resulting from influenza, as well as anyone who wants to avoid influenza infection.

Faculty Disclosure

In adherence to ACCME Standards for Commercial Support, Audio-Digest requires all faculty and planning committee members to disclose relevant financial relationships within the past 12 months that might create any personal conflicts of interest. Any identified conflicts were resolved to ensure that this educational activity promotes quality in health care and not a proprietary business or commercial interest. For this program, the following has been disclosed: Dr. Vazquez—Pfizer, Enzon, Asteen, Merck (honoraria; consultant; grants); Dr. McCullers—Aventis-Pasteur (Speakers Bureau); GlaxoSmithKline, MedImmune (Speakers Bureau; consultant). The planning committee reported nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Drs. Vazquez and McCullers were recorded at Internal Medicine Conference: The Year in Review sponsored by Orlando Regional Healthcare, July 16-20, 2007, in Lake Buena Vista, FL. The Audio-Digest Foundation thanks the speakers and the sponsor for their cooperation in the production of this program.

Reproduction of this summary in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

If, after reviewing this written summary, you would like to hear the contents and/or earn CME/CE credit:

View Main Program Listing

Visit Audio-Digest Home Page