CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: THE ROLE OF THE INTERNIST
From Mount Sinai School of Medicines 4th Annual Challenges in Internal Medicine
Educational Objectives
| The goal of this program is to improve management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and decision making
about dialysis. After hearing and assimilating this program, the clinician will be better able to:
|
 | 1. Adhere to the standard of care for managing CKD.
|
 | 2. Manage antihypertensive therapy in patients with CKD.
|
 | 3. Prepare patients with CKD for possible dialysis.
|
 | 4. Identify the medical indications for dialysis.
|
 | 5. Implement palliative care for patients with end-stage renal disease.
|
Faculty Disclosure
In adherence to ACCME Standards for Commercial Support, Audio-Digest requires all faculty and members of the
planning committee to disclose relevant financial relationships within the past 12 months that might create any personal
conflicts of interest. Any identified conflicts were resolved to ensure that this educational activity promotes quality in
health care and not a proprietary business or commercial interest. For this program, the following has been disclosed: Dr.
RadbillGenzyme (Speakers Bureau). Dr. Swidler and the planning committee reported nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgements
Drs. Radbill and Swidler were recorded at 4th Annual Challenges in Internal Medicine, sponsored by Mount Sinai
School of Medicine, and held June 25-27, 2008, in New York, NY. The Audio-Digest Foundation thanks the speakers
and the Mount Sinai School of Medicine for their cooperation in the production of this program.
Medical Management of Chronic Kidney Disease
Brian D. Radbill, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, and Clinical Director, Division of Nephrology,
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
| Kidney functions: regulatory functionsfluid, electrolyte, and acid-base balance; excretory functions
metabolic end-products (urea; creatinine); drugs; toxins; endocrinerenin (blood pressure [BP] regulation);
erythropoietin; active vitamin D (1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 ; bone metabolism); kidney failure affects many organ
systems
|
| Chronic kidney disease (CKD): complicationsedema; hyperkalemia; hyperphosphatemia; uremia; metabolic
acidosis; hypertension; anemia; hypocalcemia (secondary hyperparathyroidism)
|
| Standard of care for CKD: Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines; include patients
with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis
|
 | Goals of care: prevent progression to ESRD; treat complications of CKD; prepare patients for ESRD; renal replacement
therapyhemodialysis; peritoneal dialysis; kidney transplantation
|
| Preventing CKD progression: focus of care
|
 | Factors associated with progression: black ethnicity; decreased nephron number; modifiable risk factors
proteinuria; systolic BP >130 mm Hg; high-protein diet; obesity; anemia; dyslipidemia; smoking; nephrotoxins;
cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD)
|
 | Strategies to retard CKD progression: in addition to treating primary causeangiotensin-receptor blockers
(ARBs); angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (ACEIs); antihypertensive therapy; low-protein diet;
weight loss; erythropoietin-stimulating agents (correct anemia); statins; smoking cessation; nephrotoxin avoidance;
optimization of CV function
|
| Antihypertensives: KDOQI guidelinesuse ACEI or ARB in patients with diabetic kidney disease, with or without
hypertension; use ACEI or ARB in patients with nondiabetic kidney disease, with or without hypertension
and with spot urine total protein-to-creatinine ratio of ≥200 mg/g (≈300 mg/day [macroalbuminuria])
|
 | Therapeutic considerations: studies found ACEI and/or ARB therapy improved renal outcome; in evaluation of patients
with microalbinuria, development of macroalbuminuria used as end point; ACEI and/or ARB use not limited
by glomerular filtration rate (GFR); benefits greater in patients with advanced CKD; limitations of
therapystudy results demonstrate ACEI or ARB therapy reduces rate of GFR decline, but unable to stabilize
or increase GFR; based on study findings, speaker calculates that mean GFR savings 1 to 4 mL/min per year
|
| Management of hypertension: KDOQI guidelinestarget BP <130/80 mm Hg
|
 | Therapeutic considerations: ACEIs and ARBs first-line agents; in most studies, patients also on diuretics; dihydropyridines
(eg, amlodipine) less efficacious and tend to cause or worsen proteinuria; unclear whether lowering BP
to <140/90 mm Hg beneficial in black patients or patients with minimal proteinuria
|
| Low-protein diet: KDOQI guidelinespatients with GFR <25 mL/min (stage 4 CKD) require 0.6 g/kg (of body
weight) per day; if patient unable to tolerate diet, recommend <0.75 g/kg per day
|
 | Therapeutic considerations: high-protein diet may increase GFR and worsen hyperfiltration, causing glomerular injury;
study found no benefit from low-protein diet; still controversial; speaker concludes high-protein diet likely bad, but
very low-protein diet puts patient at risk for malnutrition
|
| Weight loss: obesity and metabolic syndrome associated with development of CKD; little evidence weight loss
slows CKD progression; weight loss recommended for reducing CV risk; however, studies show that once patient
on dialysis, obesity associated with improved survival (reverse epidemiology)
|
| Erythropoietin-stimulating agents: KDOQI guidelinestarget hemoglobin (Hb) of 11 to 12 g/dL
|
 | Therapeutic considerations: study found early treatment of anemia (to Hb >12.5 g/dL) may slow progression of
ESRD in nondiabetic patients with CKD; more recent studiesshowed no benefit from correction of anemia
(secondary end point in studies); also found correcting anemia to Hb ≥13 g/dL may increase risk for CV events
and death
|
| Statin therapy: KDOQI guidelinestriglycerides <500 mg/dL; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) <100 mg/dL
|
 | Therapeutic considerations: some subgroup analyses and meta-analyses suggest benefit of statins in slowing GFR
decline; statins recommended for CV risk reduction; optimizing CV function may also improve renal function;
study found no CV benefit from statins in diabetic patients with ESRD
|
| Smoking cessation: study followed 92 type-2 diabetic patients for 5 yr (included 39 nonsmokers and 52 smokers);
17% of smokers developed macroalbuminuria; none of nonsmokers and smokers who quit developed macroalbuminuria;
GFR decline faster in smokers
|
| Avoiding nephrotoxins: agents to avoidnonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; aminoglycosides; oral sodium
phosphate solutions; intravenous (IV) contrast gadolinium (associated with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis)
|
| Mortality outcomes: study of >1 million Medicare patients found 5 to 10 times greater chance of dying with CKD
than progressing to ESRD (CKD increased risk for CV events and death from any cause)
|
| CKD-mineral bone disorder (MBD): systemic disorder of mineral and bone metabolism due to CKD; may account
for increased CV event rate in patients with CKD; abnormalitiescalcium phosphorous, parathyroid hormone
(PTH), or vitamin D metabolism; renal osteodystrophy; vascular or other soft tissue calcifications
(especially coronary artery calcifications; associated with increased mortality)
|
 | KDOQI guidelines: provide recommendations for treating secondary hyperparathyroidism and hyperphosphatemia
in stage 3 to 4 CKD; treatmentslow phosphorous diet; phosphate binders (calcium and noncalcium); active
vitamin D supplements; possible calcium-mimetic or parathyroidectomy; alkali salts; pearl
hyperphosphatemia occurs late (GFR <40 mL/min); increased CKD mortality actually associated with phosphorus
levels in normal range; recent association of higher phosphorus level with increased mortality in non-CKD
patients
|
| Priority of goals of care: slowing progression of CKD; CVD risk reduction (greater focus needed); increase patient
education about renal replacement therapy for patients more likely to survive
|
| Role of nephrology consultation: patient education on renal replacement therapy; early consultation allows patients
more time to plan for dialysis and to discuss various options, eg, renal transplantation; helps primary care
physician manage complications of CKD; aids in establishing etiology of CKD; early referral shown to decrease
mortality
|
| Questions and answers: preserving veinsimportant for primary care physician in preparing patient for dialysis;
arteriovenous (AV) fistula placed in nondominant arm; avoid IV procedures and central lines in nondominant arm;
draw blood only from hand veins; dosages for vitamin D and phosphate bindersmain concern vitamin D levels;
depend on PTH levels for various stages of CKD; follow recommendations in guidelines; preparation for
colonoscopyspeaker advocates testing for undiagnosed CKD before administering phosphate preparation
|
Dialysis Decisions
Mark A. Swidler, MD, Assistant Professor Department of Medicine, Renal Division, Mount Sinai School of Medicine,
New York
| Landscape of ESRD and dialysis: those ≥75 yr of age fastest growing group starting dialysis; increases stepwise
from 65 yr of age; represents patients (at various stages of CKD) seen in primary care practice
|
| Long-term dialysis: not just treatment for uremia; repetitive process with unique commitments and complications;
permanent (unless patient receives transplant); repercussions of serious chronic illnessreduced lifespan; progressive
disability; repeated hospitalization; multiple comorbidities; high symptom burden; caregiver stress; trajectory
of illnesssimilar to cancer, frailty syndrome, or dementia; functional decline over months to years; 1-yr
probability of death 24%; rate of hospitalization 66%; course uncertain for each patient
|
| Prognosis: CKD risk factor for death from any cause; stepwise increase in death rate, dramatically increasing with
dialysis; expected remaining lifetime 10.5 yr in 75 to 79 yr-of-age population vs 2.7 yr in dialysis patients
|
| Adverse geriatric conditions: decreasing GFR <60 mL/min associated with increasing rate of functional limitations,
frailty syndrome, and cognitive dysfunction; affect decision about whether patient good candidate for dialysis
|
 | Factors determining mortality in dialysis patients: age; low body mass index (BMI; reflects frailty); sarcopenia (decreased
muscle mass); malnourishment; inability to ambulate or transfer
|
 | Additional concerns: increased rate of hip fracture; dementia limits survival; most vulnerable dialysis patients end
up in nursing homes (death rate 3 times rate of ESRD group as whole)
|
| Approach to decisions: decision pathconsent to dialysis; withholding, withdrawing, or forgoing therapy;
time-limited trial; settingsacute renal failure; complications in patient already on dialysis; predialysis patient
with CKD stage 4 to 5
|
 | Questions to consider: is patient dialysis candidate? what does patient need to know from us? what do we need to
know from patient and family?
|
| Four topics method: for analysis of ethical problems in clinical medicine
|
 | Medical indications for intervention: ethical basisbeneficence and maleficence (benefits vs burdens); information
on prognosis
|
 | Prognosis: includes lifestyle and functional level
|
 | Patient preferences: ethical basisrespect for autonomy (informed consent)
|
 | Autonomy: does not necessarily involve specific decisions about whether to start dialysis; includes patients desire
not to know problem
|
 | Quality of life: ethical basisbeneficence and nonmaleficence; respect for autonomy; no universal criterion
|
 | Contextual features: ethical basisloyalty and fairness (health resources; family dynamics and support)
|
| Medical indications for dialysis: analysis of Medicare database over 9 yr found annual increase in patients ≥85 yr
of age going on dialysis (1-yr mortality 46%; relative risk for death 68% higher in those with many comorbidities
|
 | Nondialytic treatment: study comparing groups that did and did not go on dialysis found more deaths and
shorter survival time in those not going on dialysis; patients with high comorbidity scores fared no better going
on dialysis than those who did not; patients with ischemic heart disease failed to increase survival with
dialysis
|
| Patient preferences: informed consent (decisional capacity); informed right to forgo treatment; advanced directives;
health care proxy; considerationspreferences can change; some patients unable to decide or express preferences;
some do not want to receive information and prefer to delegate to others
|
| Quality of life (QOL): no universal measurement; value judgment and personal; objective data include end-stage
dementia, cachexia, and advanced cancer; consider time-limited trial to assess QOL on dialysis
|
| Renal palliative care: agreed-upon plan to optimize QOL and relieve suffering (pain and symptom management);
offered at same time as other medical therapies; not synonymous with end-of-life or hospice care; not just absence
of dialysis; appropriate for all patients with serious illness (high symptom burden; shortened survival; significant
comorbidity); multidisciplinary
|
 | Components: active treatment of renal complications and symptoms to improve QOL; advanced care planning (ongoing
communication to update prognosis, goals of care, and trajectory of decline); family and patient support
(creating sense of control; relieving burden; strengthening family relationships); hospice referral (when estimated
survival <6 mo)
|
| Start discussions early: to avoid conflict among family members; at CKD stage 4 (GFR 15-29 mL/min; serum
creatinine 2.5-3 mg%; ≥65 yr of age); educate patient and family about pros and cons of dialysis; consider transplantation;
explore patient preferences with family and friends (talk to health care proxy); use 4-topic method;
avoid potential problemseg, moderate-to-severely impaired decision-making skills in nursing home patients on
dialysis (most without advanced care directives)
|
Suggested Reading
Dhingra R et al: Relations of serum phosphorus and calcium levels to the incidence of cardiovascular disease in the community.
Arch Intern Med 167:879, 2007; Drüeke TB et al: Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney
disease and anemia. N Engl J Med 355:2071, 2006; Klahr S et al: The effects of dietary protein restriction and blood-pressure
control on the progression of chronic renal disease. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. N Engl J Med
330:877, 1994; Kramer H et al: Association between chronic kidney disease and coronary artery calcification: the Dallas
Heart Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 16:507, 2005; Lewis EJ et al: Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist
irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 345:851, 2001; Moe S et al: Definition, evaluation,
and classification of renal osteodystrophy: a position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO).
Kidney Int 69:1945, 2006; Murray SA et al: Illness trajectories and palliative care. BMJ 330:1007, 2005; Murray SA et
al: Palliative care in chronic illness. BMJ 330:611, 2005; Wright JT Jr et al: Effect of blood pressure lowering and antihypertensive
drug class on progression of hypertensive kidney disease: results from the AASK trial. JAMA 288:2421, 2002.
|