PEARLS IN PEDIATRIC OTOLARYNGOLOGY
Educational Objectives
| The goals of this program are to improve the management of airway obstruction in infants without performing tracheotomy,
improve evaluation and management of sensorineural hearing loss, and improve application of the latest techniques in tonsillectomy.
After hearing and assimilating this program, the clinician will be better able to:
|
 | 1. Utilize surgical procedures other than tracheotomy to manage conditions that lead to airway obstruction in infants.
|
 | 2. Review the most common genetic and acquired causes of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).
|
 | 3. Discuss the likelihood of contralateral involvement in patients with unilateral SNHL.
|
 | 4. Describe the coblation tonsillectomy technique and its advantages over standard electrocautery tonsillectomy.
|
 | 5. Discuss the likelihood of retro- and parapharyngeal abscess after tonsillectomy.
|
Faculty Disclosure
In adherence to ACCME Standards for Commercial Support, Audio-Digest requires all faculty and members of the planning
committee to disclose relevant financial relationships within the past 12 months that might create any personal conflicts of interest.
Any identified conflicts were resolved to ensure that this educational activity promotes quality in health care and not a
proprietary business or commercial interest. For this program, the following has been disclosed: Dr. Chang is a consultant for
Arthrocare. Drs. White, Lambert, Uwiera, and Duval and the planning committee reported nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgements
Drs. White and Lambert were recorded at the 8th Annual Charleston Magnolia Conference, held May 29-31, 2008, in
Charleston, SC, and sponsored by the Medical University of South Carolina, Department of OtolaryngologyHead
and Neck Surgery and Office of Continuing Medical Education. Drs. Uwiera and Duval were recorded at the American
Society of Pediatric Otolaryngologists 23rd Annual Meeting, held May 2-4, 2008, in Orlando, FL, and sponsored
by the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngologists. Dr. Chang was recorded at the UCSF Otolaryngology Update:
2007, held November 8-10, 2007, in San Francisco, CA, and sponsored by the Department of
OtolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery of the University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine. The
Audio-Digest Foundation thanks the speakers and the sponsors for their cooperation in the production of this program.
Avoiding Tracheotomy in Infants
David R. White, MD, Assistant Professor of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| Tracheotomy: provides perfect airway, but carries morbidity and mortality; bypasses airway problem instead of addressing
it primarily
|
| Airway evaluation: in neonates, airway from tip of nose to bronchi; problems with nose include choanal stenosis or atresia,
pyriform aperture stenosis, and congenital nasolacrimal duct cyst; after physical examination, perform airway endoscopy;
rigid and flexible bronchoscopy complementary procedures; rigid bronchoscopyprovides better evaluation of
fixed stenosis (length and character); provides only adequate view of posterior commissure; flexible bronchoscopy
provides better view of anterior commissure and better evaluation of airway dynamics; pulmonology evaluation
reveals whether lungs ready for procedure other than tracheotomy
|
| Pierre Robin syndrome: tracheotomy and nasogastric tube classic approach; vertical positioning of tongue seen, ie,
tongue projects through cleft palate into nose; tongue-lip adhesionpulls tongue forward and down; anterior pull on
tongue brings tongue base out of oropharynx; varying success rates (40%- 80%); does not address primary problem, ie,
small jaw; in some children, mandibular growth catches up within first year, but many require mandibular distraction in
future (usually when child >2 yr of age); distraction osteogenesis5 basic steps include 1) cutting bone (osteotomy) to
2) initiate inflammation and osteoblastic reaction; 3) more bone formation to fill gap (similar to callus formation in healing
of fracture); 4) distraction to increase size of gap (pulling 2 intact pieces of bone apart slowly); 5) filling gap with
bone (osteogenesis); methodexternal Risdon approach; in older children, internal transoral approach used (difficult in
neonates because of size of mouth); ideally, osteotomy made behind tooth buds; pins placed anterior and posterior to osteotomy;
external devices placed; length between 2 pins increased at rate of 1 to 2 mm/day; usually, 2 to 2.5 cm of bone
grown in 2 wk; devices then locked down, becoming external fixators for 4 to 6 wk of consolidation phase; pins then removed
(solid bone present); long-term risk for bilateral facial scars
|
| Subglottic stenosis: anterior cricoid split (ACS)split of anterior cricoid cartilage leaves open wound to heal with endotracheal
tube stenting; initial success rates 58% to 100%; stringent criteria, ie, no other problems except failure to extubate;
declining success rates; experimentation with various types of cartilage augmentation; serieslooked at ACS vs
primary laryngotracheoplasty (LTP) in neonates; those who had cartilage augmentation or primary laryngotracheal reconstruction
did much better (81% success rate); success rate of ACS 28%; speakers methodutilizes thyroid ala graft;
performs ACS and posterior CS to decompress subglottic airway; overall, ACS results poor; LTPresults better than expected,
despite higher grade of stenosis; provides more aggressive means of expanding airway; combined with other procedures
to more greatly decompress larynx
|
| Congenital tracheal stenosis: complete tracheal ringsin last few years, slide tracheoplasty procedure of choice; previously,
mortality 50% to 80%, even with early identification and intervention; slide tracheoplastyreduces length of
trachea by half, but doubles diameter, reducing resistance to flow; long oblique suture line reduces amount of pull on trachea
and disperses force, reducing risk for dehiscence; applicable in short- and long-segment tracheal stenosis and sometimes
even with tracheal anastomosis in older patient
|
| Conclusion: when looking at neonate with airway obstruction, consider nose; if nose normal, assess lungs; consider whether to
treat primarily or bypass problem and perform tracheotomy; consider early preemptive application of procedures to avoid tracheotomy
|
Evaluating Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Paul R. Lambert, MD, Professor and Chair, Department of OtolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery, Medical University
of South Carolina, Charleston
| Genetic losses: ≈50% of pediatric sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL); 75% to 80% of genetic losses autosomal recessive;
small percentage syndromic; CJB2 gene that encodes for Connexin 26 (Cx 26) accounts for 50% of genetic losses; gap
junctionsallow adjacent cells to communicate (exchange of ions, small molecules, and other messengers); in inner ear,
prevalent in supporting cells around hair cells and in stria vascularis; within auditory system, primarily Cx 26 and occasionally
Cx 30; Cx 26relatively small; ≈100 mutations identified; majority deletion of one guanosine nucleotide at base pair
35 position (35delG); recessive trait; carrier rate 2.5% to 3%; 1 in 4000 births expected to have Cx 26 mutation; phenotypically,
prelingual in onset, rarely progressive; variable severity, but majority of loss severe to profound, and bilateral (cochlear
implant effective); for those with moderate loss, reassurance that loss unlikely to progress; audiogram shows flat or
downsloping SNHL; studies of temporal bone show near-total degeneration of hair cells, agenesis of stria vascularis, no neural
degeneration, and good population of spiral ganglion cells
|
| Acquired SNHL: cytomegalovirus (CMV)most common intrauterine infection; seen in ≈1% of children born in United
States; majority asymptomatic; presents in several ways; problem with diagnosis of CMV as etiology for hearing loss when
infant >1 mo of age; unless viral DNA seen in urine or saliva in first 2 wk of life, unclear whether CMV infection congenital
or postnatal; postnatal infection does not carry significant risk for hearing loss; children common carriers of CMV (in daycare
setting, ≈1 in 4 children carriers or excreting virus actively)
|
| Evaluation: historyprenatal, natal, postnatal, and family; physical examinationlook for syndromic issues; in majority
of cases, history and physical examination unrevealing; electrocardiography (ECG); thyroid and renal function studies;
urinalysis; serologies; possibly CT; speakers experience that few studies show positive results; laboratory studies
not helpful; over one-third of CTs positive, with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) most common finding
|
| Vestibular aqueduct (VA): important embryologically; if abnormality seen in VA, most likely other problem occurring in
inner ear; early in development, VA short, straight, and wide, but narrows with maturity; EVAsuggests arrested development;
bilateral in most cases, although asymmetry in degree of hearing loss present sometimes; progression of loss seen in
majority; occasionally associated with Pendreds syndrome; occasionally associated with low-frequency mild conductive
hearing loss
|
| Mondini malformation: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak into middle ear, predisposing to meningitis; bony partition between
internal auditory canal and cochlea absent; constant pulsation of CSF, causing erosion of stapes footplate, leak of
CSF into middle ear, and recurrent meningitis
|
| Speakers approach: if SNHL unilateral, only CT performed; if bilateral, obtain Cx 26 screen first; if negative, obtain
CT; ECG obtained if any suggestion of cardiac abnormality present; fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA) test only if
positive maternal history present
|
Progression and Contralateral Involvement in Unilateral Hearing Loss
Trina C. Uwiera, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, and Pediatric Otolaryngologist,
Stollery Childrens Hospital, Edmonton; Alessandro de Alarcon, MD, Resident Physician and Assistant
Professor of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| Introduction: from literature, progression rate 1% to 2.5% on affected side in child with unilateral SNHL and rare involvement
(<1%) of contralateral side; presence of EVA increased risk for progression to 18% to 65%
|
| Study: retrospective database review; 198 patients with unilateral SNHL (>20 dB hearing loss on 1 frequency) and normal
ear with no hearing loss (HL) in any other frequencies; mean HL 38 dB; progression defined as HL of pure-tone average
change of 4 frequencies of >15 dB over 3 mo; median follow-up 25.3 mo; results21% progression found; overall progression
rate 9 dB over 1 yr; mild HL at presentation progressed to moderate category; 10.6% (15) developed involvement
of contralateral ear, 5.6% (8) of whom progressed, and 6 of these had predominantly high-frequency loss; high-
frequency loss at presentation 31% rate of contralateral ear involvement; 26 patients with other temporal bone
anomalies more frequently presented as profound SNHL; 2 patients developed contralateral HL, with no evidence of
progression; conclusionunilateral SNHL not unilateral disease; progression occurs and can involve contralateral side
(seen more frequently than previously reported); development of high-frequency HL in normal ear more than previously
expected; should monitor both ears for progression and bilateral involvement
|
The Latest Techniques in Tonsillectomy
Kay W. Chang, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo
Alto, CA
| Tonsillectomy techniques: categorieshigh-energy, high-temperature subcapsular total tonsillectomy; low-energy,
low-temperature technique, which includes cold dissection; intracapsular (subtotal) techniques, mostly performed with
microdebrider or coblation; speaker believes no significant differences between techniques within category, but clinical
differences across categories; coblationsecond most commonly used tonsillectomy device in United States (after
monopolar [Bovie] electrocautery); straddles 2 categories (low-temperature subcapsular total tonsillectomy and intracapsular
tonsillectomy); surveyshowed that for primary indication of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), 75% of surgeons
used total tonsillectomy techniques, and 25% utilized intracapsular and total tonsillectomy techniques; for
recurrent tonsillitis, fewer surgeons employ intracapsular technique; monopolar electrocautery most common total
tonsillectomy instrument used; subtotal tonsillectomy instrument depended on indication (for OSA, microdebrider; for
infection, coblation and microdebrider)
|
| Review of literature: microdebrider intracapsular tonsillectomydecreased pain and more rapid recovery observed;
3.2% regrowth rate; Solares et al (2005)found that in addition to benefits of decreased pain and rapid recovery, bleeding
rate and rate of admission for dehydration lower with intracapsular tonsillectomy; Smith et al (2007)found no increase
in infections with intracapsular technique vs standard electrocautery total tonsillectomy; Chan et al (2004)
demonstrated decreased medication and increased oral intake; at 1-yr follow-up, residual tonsil present in 73% of patients;
Arya et alon one side, coblation with total tonsillectomy technique (on other side intracapsular technique used); found
no difference in pain between 2 sides (first 24 hr); intracapsular techniquevariety of devices (eg, radiofrequency Surgitron
Ellman device, bipolar scissors) with similar benefits; speaker prefers coblation (removes tonsillar tissue almost as
fast as microdebrider without bleeding)
|
| Coblation: uses bipolar radiofrequency energy with conductive saline medium to produce plasma field that results in dissociation
of tissue molecules with minimal thermal energy release; results in surface tissue temperatures of 40° to 70°C,
while electrocautery causes tissue heating of 400°C; 2 modalitiesat setting of 6 to 9, generating plasma field and operating
in coblation mode; at setting of 1 to 5, in resistive thermal mode, with tissue temperatures proportional to amount of
power applied (coblator operating like bipolar electrocautery); lowest setting to achieve coblation is 6
|
| Speakers study: 101 participants with operative indication of OSA; prospectively randomized to intracapsular coblation
or standard electrocautery tonsillectomy; no complications observed in either group, with similar rates of nausea and
vomiting; coblation group had less pain, able to eat more, and able to resume greater levels of normal activity at 3 time
points (statistically significant from day 3 onwards); concluded that coblation-assisted intracapsular tonsillectomy resulted
in better recovery than standard electrocautery tonsillectomy
|
| Coblation technique: coblation wand not ideally suited as dissection device for making fine cuts (designed as ablation
device), and necessary to modify technique; active surface electrodes must face toward tonsil and away from fossa at all
times; failure to do so results in deep ablative lesions in tonsillar fossa, exposing larger blood vessels, resulting in increased
intraoperative and postoperative bleeding; speakers study69 children, with operative indication of OSA; randomized
to intracapsular or subcapsular procedure, using coblation; pain identical in both groups on day 1; on day 5,
subcapsular group doing worse than intracapsular group (although still better than electrocautery group); on days 1 and 5,
intracapsular patients ate more and more active; technical tipsduring learning curve, handpiece can become clogged
with tissue; maintain constant tip motion and high saline flow; periodically clear saline through wand; as technique mastered,
wand ceases to clog; Herd retractor used to protect pillar and helps to rotate tonsil out to expose depth of ablation;
goal 90% to 95% removal, while avoiding penetrating capsule; end result to achieve smooth concavity representing tonsillar
fossa; observationsclear that low-temperature techniques have advantage; study data show that primary hemorrhage
rates start high but drop to zero once surgeon past 30th case; delayed hemorrhage rates also decrease as surgeons
gain more experience with coblation;
|
| Conclusions: coblation suboptimal technique (ideal tonsillectomy device should have much shallower learning curve and
feel natural and safe to use after few cases); search for ideal device ongoing; should consider adding intracapsular techniques
to armamentarium (demonstrated benefits to recovery considerable and risk for bleeding decreased); major disadvantages
of regrowth and infection not clinically significant
|
Association Between Retropharyngeal and Parapharyngeal Abscesses and Adenotonsillectomy
Melanie Duval, MD, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal
| Introduction: retropharyngeal and parapharyngeal abscesses uncommon infections associated with potentially severe
complications; hypothesis that since adenoids and tonsils lymphoid tissues that act as filters for pharyngeal infection, their
removal would increase likelihood of pharyngeal abscesses; multiple studies demonstrate that after tonsillectomy, decrease
in level of immunoglobulins seen; decrease in IgM, IgG, and IgE levels 38 mo after tonsillectomy; however, another study
showed that children with tonsil disease who do not undergo surgery have decrease in IgM and IgG levels comparable to
that seen after surgery; children 4 to 8 yr of age at time of tonsillectomy have significant decrease in IgE
|
| Study: found that children with retro- or parapharyngeal abscess 7 times more likely to have had tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy
(T and A; statistically significant); majority developed abscess 1 yr after surgery; however, unable to confirm
whether direct result of T and A or whether children predisposed to develop abscesses for other reasons
|
Suggested Reading
Arjmand EM et al: Audiometric findings in children with a large vestibular aqueduct. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
130:1169, 2004; Arya AK et al: Double-blind randomized controlled study of coblation tonsillotomy versus coblation tonsillectomy
on postoperative pain in children. Clin Otolaryngol 30:226, 2005; Burstein FD et al: Mandibular distraction osteogenesis
in Pierre Robin sequence: application of a new internal single-stage resorbable device. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:61, 2005;
Colen TY et al: Effect of intracapsular tonsillectomy on quality of life for children with obstructive sleep-disordered breathing.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:124, 2008; Denny A et al: New technique for airway correction in neonates with severe
Pierre Robin sequence. J Pediatr 147:97, 2005; Duncan RD et al: Pediatric otolaryngologists' use of genetic testing.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:231, 2007; Glynn F et al: Parapharyngeal abscess in an insulin dependent diabetic patient
following an elective tonsillectomy. J Laryngol Otol 121:e16, 2007; Goldstein NA et al: Quality of life after tonsillectomy
in children with recurrent tonsillitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138:S9, 2008; Kocyildirim E et al: Long-segment
tracheal stenosis: slide tracheoplasty and a multidisciplinary approach improve outcomes and reduce costs. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg 128:876, 2004; Lipman DS: Tonsillectomy techniques. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:279; Lister MT et al:
Microdebrider tonsillotomy vs electrosurgical tonsillectomy: a randomized, double-blind, paired control study of postoperative
pain. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:599, 2006; Rotenberg BW et al: Changing trends in the success rate of anterior
cricoid split. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115:833, 2006; Salvinelli F et al: Hearing loss associated with 35delG mutation in
Connexin-26 (GJB2) gene: audiogram analysis. J Laryngol Otol 118:8, 2004; Solares CA et al: Safety and efficacy of powered
intracapsular tonsillectomy in children: a multi-center retrospective case series. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 69:21, 2005;
Tan AK et al: Coblation vs electrocautery tonsillectomy: postoperative recovery in adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
135:699, 2006.
|