Audio-Digest Foundation: urology

Main Written Summaries Listing | Urology: 2008 Listings
Audio-Digest FoundationUrology


Volume 31, Issue 01
January 1, 2008

The following is an abstracted summary, not a verbatim transcript, of the lectures/discussions on this audio program. If, after reviewing this written summary, you would like to hear the contents and/or earn CME/CE credit, simply visit the Audio-Digest Foundation website

Urology Program InfoAccreditation InfoCultural & Linguistic Competency Resources





ISSUES IN ANDROLOGY

From the New York University Postgraduate Medical School Symposium on Surgical, Pharmacological, and Technological Advances in Adult and Pediatric Urology: State-of-the Art

PHOSPHODIESTERASE TYPE 5 (PDE-5) INHIBITORS FOR ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION (ED): ARE THEY ALL THE SAME ?—Stephen M. Auerbach, MD, Medical Director of California Professional Research, and Staff Member, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA
Erectile dysfunction: potential problems—emotional issue, ie, patient too embarrassed to discuss situation; patient’s physician may not consider ED to be real disease; disease may be warning sign for cardiovascular (CV) disease; causes—age-related changes; diabetes mellitus; heart disease; hyperlipidemia; hypertension; prostate cancer treatment; couple-related factors—age-related problems, eg, arthritis; issues of concern to women (eg, poor communication, postmenopausal changes), and differences in level of sexual desire
Basic evaluation: avoids “doorknob close” statement from patient, ie, “Can you write me a prescription for sildenafil (eg, Viagra), vardenafil (Levitra), or tadalafil (Cialis)?”; ask patient whether he has any—erection problems (question requires yes or no answer); new illnesses or takes new medications; laboratory evaluation—obtain serum and free testosterone levels in morning; basic blood work-up; CV evaluation—necessary when concerned about physical exertion during sex; indicated for men who have trouble walking up stairs or pain with exercise; metabolic equivalent table (MET) facilitates assessment of exertion level from various physical activities
Comparison of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (ie, sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil): drug selection depends on preference of patient and physician
Factors to consider: effectiveness—all 3 drugs work well; determine which drug works best in particular patient; early onset of action—all 3 drugs work within 15 min; some patients expect drugs to work before they have achieved maximum levels of effectiveness; absorption times—sildenafil (1 hr); vardenafil (0.8 hr); tadalafil (2 hr); onset of action with food—sildenafil (2 hr); vardenafil (absorption delayed 18%-50% by high-fat meals); tadalafil (absorption unaffected); half-life—sildenafil (3.7 hr); vardenafil (4.6 hr); tadalafil (17.5 hr); point—some men report better erections on morning after taking sildenafil or vardenafil; this experience may influence drug preference; side effects— headache, dyspepsia, and nasal congestion with all 3 drugs; flushing with sildenafil and vardenafil; backache and myalgia with tadalafil; blue vision in small percentage of men taking sildenafil
Cardiac safety: PDE-5 inhibitors—never use in combination with nitrates (risk for hypotension); do not increase risk for myocardial infarction (MI) or death (eg, sildenafil can be used in men with pulmonary hypertension); considered safe with multiple blood pressure medications; can be used after angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery when cardiologist clears patient for sexual activity; with cardiac emergency—nitrates can be administered 24 hr after administration of sildenafil or vardenafil and 48 hr after administration of tadalafil; all emergency facilities have protocols for administering alternative medications to patients taking PDE-5 inhibitors
Additional pointers to facilitate management: patients should—try specific drug on 5 occasions before switching to another drug (compensates for anxiety and worry generated by ED); try all PDE-5 inhibitors before making final selection (one drug may be more effective or have fewer side effects than others); determine copayment for each drug; to maximize therapeutic efficacy—sexual stimulation necessary; multiple attempts and dosage adjustments may be required; testosterone therapy may improve therapeutic response in hypogonadal men; involve partner in process; options when oral therapy fails—vacuum erection; penile injections; penile implants
PDE-5 INHIBITORS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS (LUTS) AND ED — Arthur L. Burnett II, MD, Professor of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Lower urinary tract symptoms and ED: epidemiologic data suggest—association may exist between ED and LUTS; men with LUTS may face increased risk of developing ED; quality of erectile function can vary inversely with severity of LUTS symptoms (such activity may occur independently of age); risk factors of interest—aging; androgens; benign prostatic hyperplasia (ie, local paracrine factors have been associated with progression of BPH); regulatory factors for ED, including neurotransmitters, hormonal factors, and local paracrine factors in genitalia; trophic mechanisms; genetic involvement; concept—ED, BPH, and LUTS may describe symptoms of associated underlying disease; proposed pathogenic links—nitric oxide (NO) pathway; autonomic hyperactivity or metabolic syndrome (ie, involvement of sympathetic nervous system); endothelins and rho-kinase pathways (thought to be vasoconstrictive component of various smooth muscle tissue states involving vasculature, penis, and lower urinary tract); pelvic atherosclerosis
NO pathway: relaxation of smooth muscle tissue occurs in response to release of NO via cholinergic nerve activity and other endothelial sources
Activity within smooth muscle cell: NO binds to iron within heme moiety of guanine cyclase; cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)—potent second-messenger molecule; forms when enzyme interacts with guanosine triphosphate; activates protein kinase G, which changes calcium levels within tissue and elicits tissue relaxation; point—PDE-5 inhibitors promote cGMP effect; data—suggest BPH potentially associated with low NO release; show decrease in nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-containing nerves in BPH tissue; indicate NO relevant factor in contractility of prostate tissue
Phosphodiesterases: data suggest—mechanisms besides NO pathway may play role in tissue response of prostate and urinary outlet; nitrates administered to men with obstructive BPH seem to exert favorable effect on urinary flow rates, international prostate symptom scores (IPSS), and urinary volumes; PDE-4 and PDE-5 active in human prostate and play role in tissue contractility; sildenafil potentiated NO cGMP effect (ie, IPSS and sexual function improved)
Clinical trial data: when compared to placebo, men receiving tadalafil (5-mg dose administered at 6 wk increased to 20 mg at 12 wk)—experienced improved quality of life (QOL) or IPSS by 12 wk; derived significant benefit as shown by BPH impact index at 12 wk; demonstrated no significant difference in urinary flow rates or residual urine volumes; men with ED and BPH-related LUTS who received sildenafil had—no change in urinary flow rates; improved erectile-function, relationship, and IPSS scores; improved BPH and QOL parameters; combination of sildenafil and alfuzosin (α-blocker)—dramatically improved IPSS scores and urinary flow rates; may provide greatest therapeutic benefit
PDE-5 inhibition in men with BPH and LUTS: data suggest—long-term use of PDE-5 inhibitors may improve voiding and erectile function in men with concomitant ED and LUTS; combination of α-blocker and PDE-5 inhibitor may be most effective intervention; points—biologic mechanism of effect elusive for PDE-5 inhibition; animal data suggest PDE-5 inhibitors may activate endothelial NO release in vascular mechanism
Conclusions: relationship between LUTS and ED—demonstrated by epidemiologic studies; may involve commonality of risk factors and some molecular mechanisms; PDE-5 inhibitor therapy—potential therapeutic relevance for ED and LUTS suggests pathogenic link for both conditions; therapeutic benefit may be matter of smooth muscle relaxation and reconditioning effect involving endothelial NO
PREMATURE EJACULATION: BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD —Andrew R. McCullough, MD, Associate Professor of Urology, Director of Sexual Health and Fertility, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
Premature ejaculation (PE): defined by American Urological Association (AUA) as ejaculation occurring sooner than desired, either before or shortly after penetration, and causing distress to one or both partners; intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT)—data suggest mean IELT lasts <3 min in men with PE and >9 min in men with “normal” ejaculatory function; in reality, considerable overlap exists, with normal IELT still undetermined, ie, some men consider their normal IELT to be abnormal; prevalence of—ED increases with age; PE remains constant in men 59 yr of age (men >59 yr of age, develop form of PE associated with ED); PE can adversely affect—sexual performance and satisfaction; social life; psychologic well being, ie, decreased self confidence and anxiety about having sex; PE can affect couple’s relationship—while some men feel they cannot fulfill partner’s needs, others are satisfied with being able to achieve ejaculation; in some cases, concerned woman seeks help for unconcerned partner with PE
Etiology of PE: multifactorial; biologic basis—in animal models, low serotonin levels produce situation similar to PE; in humans, biologic PE may be caused by hypersensitivity and/or hyposensitivity of serotonin receptors located at synaptic cleft (large number of receptors may create multifactorial problem and explain why some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] work better than others); psychologic basis—usually acquired; may involve problem with one partner; usually associated with anxiety or early sexual experiences; can be related to frequency of sexual activity, complicated psychodynamics, or evolution; points—primary PE probably has strong biogenic component; acquired PE more likely psychogenic problem and can be associated with ED or use of medications
AUA guidelines for diagnosing PE: sexual history should determine—frequency and duration of PE; relationship to partner; frequency and nature of sexual activity; aggravating or alleviating factors; effect of PE on sexual activity, relationships, and QOL; relationship to drug use or abuse; ask patient whether he usually ejaculates too soon—if yes, problem exists; if no, man does not have PE; key point—50% of patients not bothered by their PE
Management: self-help—multiple condoms; masturbation prior to intercourse (approach delays IELT of secondary erection; less effective as men age and secondary erections become more difficult to achieve); mental exercises during sex; psychologic intervention (poor results long term); vacuum erection devices and penile injections—cumbersome; constrict base of penis and create nonejaculation situation; topical therapy—combination of lidocaine and prilocaine (increased average IELT from 1 min 24 sec to 11 min; can cause vaginal numbness); SS cream (proprietary; not available in United States; efficacy unconfirmed)
PDE-5 inhibitors: off-label use; allow erections to occur with less stimulation; decrease refractory period for erection, enabling patient to resume intercourse within refractory period for orgasm, ie, patient with mild ED can regain erectile function of younger man and achieve second orgasm that takes longer to achieve; sildenafil—helps older men with PE and associated ED recover erections more quickly; on-demand sildenafil proved superior to alternative techniques (eg, pause-squeeze technique ) for ejaculatory latency and patient satisfaction; in men with mixed PE and ED, PDE-5 inhibitors—may be ideal therapeutic option; avoid use of SSRIS and associated mania/cycling; may be used in addition to SSRIs in refractory cases; mechanism of action unclear
SSRIs: off-label use; activate 5-HT2c receptors and increase set point of ejaculatory threshold; paroxetine—initial 10-mg dose can be increased to 20 mg; patient requiring higher doses should be referred to mental health professional; several weeks of continuous therapy required to improve mean IELT; side effects significant problem for men who, theoretically, must take drug for life; limitations of SSRIs—long-term dosing; unpredictability of therapeutic response; delayed onset of action and long half-life not conducive to on-demand therapy; side effects (dry mouth; nervousness; gastrointestinal upset; headaches; drowsiness; decreased libido and erectile function with long-term dosing)
Points: ideal drug for PE must be fast acting, have short half-life, and be capable of activating selected serotonin receptors; initial SSRI developed for PE not approved for use by Food and Drug Administration (problem probably associated with risk for depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation associated with withdrawal of short-acting SSRIs); dapoxetine—evaluated at 30-mg and 60-mg doses; peak serum level at 1 hr; eliminated from body 24 hr; 30-mg dose achieved 3-fold increase in IELT (increase slightly higher with 60-mg dose); achieved high level of patient satisfaction, even though side effects could be problematic; side effects include—nausea at higher doses (fairly well tolerated); decreased libido and ED in subset of men
ANDROGEN REPLACEMENT AND PROSTATE CANCER —Dr. Burnett
Androgen deficiency in aging male (ADAM): common problem; refers to documented decline in levels of bioeffective testosterone in men >50 yr of age; symptom cluster includes—decrease in libido and sexual function, muscle mass and strength, and cognitive ability; loss of secondary sexual characteristics; point—androgen supply may be important in preserving sexual function and overall health in men; hypogonadism in ADAM—may involve central mechanism, ie, men demonstrate abnormal secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and failure to increase leuteinizing hormone; in addition, as men age, increased levels of sex hormone–binding globulin may decrease levels of free testosterone or testosterone that can be released immediately from albumin
Testosterone replacement therapy: favored by many men eager to preserve sense of well-being; contraindicated in men with prostate and breast cancers; data suggest approach may help—address deficiencies in sexual function; restore psychologic well being; improve overall body function, bone mass, and strength; decrease CV risk; can potentially increase risk for—hepatotoxicity (risk contraindicates use of oral testosterone supplements); prostate cancer; edema; exacerbating preexisting cardiac, renal, or hepatic disease; gynecomastia; sleep-related complications
Risk for prostate cancer in men receiving testosterone administration: factors suggesting potential risk— prostate gland relies on androgens for growth (testosterone replacement therapy can increase prostate size and prostate specific antigen [PSA] levels in hypogonadal men); role of androgen ablation in managing advanced prostate cancer (testosterone supplementation may exert opposite effect); literature survey provides no evidence that—normal testosterone levels promote carcinogenesis; testosterone replacement initiates or promotes de novo or preexisting prostate cancer; utility of testosterone replacement therapy—remains open question; larger randomized trials with appropriate follow-up may clarify issue
Recommendations: candidates for testosterone replacement—must be screened routinely; should not have high-risk profile based on routine evaluation; when patients undergo replacement therapy—monitor with digital rectal examination (DRE) and PSA evaluation; maintain low threshold for biopsy, ie, >1 ng/mL increase in serum PSA 6 mo after start of therapy or >0.4 ng/mL increase at 6 mo; in men who have undergone radical prostatectomy—administer lowest dose of testosterone necessary to achieve eugonadal state; continue therapy only if signs and symptoms of hypogonadism improve; if patient’s status does not improve, further treatment may not be appropriate; perform DRE and PSA evaluation every 1 to 2 mo during first year and every 5 to 6 mo thereafter; with any increases in PSA, discontinue therapy and look for cancer recurrence

Suggested Reading

Andersson KE et al: Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) and PDE inhibitor for treatment of LUTS. Neurourol Urodyn 26:928, 2007; Barqawi A, Crawford ED: Testosterone replacement therapy and the risk of prostate cancer. Is there a link? Int J Impot Res 18:323, 2006; Burnett AL: Phosphodiesterase 5 mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Am J Cardiol 96:29M, 2005; Hellstrom WJ: Current and future pharmacotherapies of premature ejaculation. J Sex Med 332:41, 2006; Sharlip ID: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of premature ejaculation. J Sex Mod 4:309, 2006; Young JM et al: Tadalafil improved erectile function at twenty-four and thirty-six hours after dosing in men with erectile dysfunction: US trial. J Androl 26:310, 2005.

Educational Objectives

The goal of this program is to improve management of issues related to andrology. After hearing and assimilating this program, the clinician will be better able to:
1. Evaluate and treat men presenting with erectile dysfunction (ED).
2. Compare the relative clinical merits of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors in the management of ED.
3. Determine the potential role of PDE-5 inhibitors in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms .
4. Review current techniques for managing and treating premature ejaculation.
5. Assess the potential risk for prostate cancer in men undergoing testosterone replacement therapy.

Faculty Disclosure

In adherence to ACCME Standards for Commercial Support, Audio-Digest requires all faculty and planning committee members to disclose relevant financial relationships within the past 12 months that might create any personal conflicts of interest. Any identified conflicts were resolved to ensure that this educational activity promotes quality in health care and not a proprietary business or commercial interest. For this program, the following has been disclosed: Dr. Auerbach is affiliated with Eli Lilly & Co, Pfizer Inc, and Schering-Plough Corp; Dr. Burnett is affiliated with Pfizer Inc and Lilly ICOS; Dr. McCullough is affiliated with Allergan, Alza/Johnson & Johnson, Astellas Pharma Inc, Auxilium, Bayer GSK, Guilford/Symphony Neurodevelopment, Ion Channel, Lilly ICOS, Merck, MGI Pharma, Nexmed, Oscient Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Inc, Schwarz Pharma, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Threshold Pharmaceuticals, VIOptix Inc, and Vivus. The planning committee reported nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Drs. Auerbach, Burnett, and McCullough gave their lectures at Surgical, Pharmacological, and Technological Advances in Adult and Pediatric Urology: State-of-the Art, presented December 7-9, 2006, in New York, NY, by New York University Postgraduate Medical School. The Audio-Digest Foundation thanks the speakers and the sponsor for their cooperation in the production of this program.

Reproduction of this summary in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.